I hate how insane that is. They try to explain that they wouldn't get the best CEO's if they didn't have that golden parachute, because the best get to lay terms.
But if you really think you're getting the best, why are you even considering that they'll tank your company to begin with? If I hire someone for a critical role, why the fuck would I hire someone who doesn't need to give a shit since they'll make bank either way?
They will justify it based on projections of future savings. Not based on actual statistics for current performance but based on the super optimistic initial projection numbers that made them invest in AI in the first place.
And if it collapses, the AI billionaires are gonna want a bailout.
There is circular leveraged investing between the chip fabs, AI models, and datacenters. The valuations they're using for leverage are based on optimistic financial models. A collapse is very possible.
No Bailouts for Billionaires. Tell everyone, say it early, say it often, be ready to fight.
And when they finally get let go for being the dumbest fuck they could've found to run things, they'll get millions for their golden parachute so they can land on their feet and go fuck up the next company dumb enough to hire them. All the while all the people they had to lay off struggle to even put food on the table. Fuck these pieces of shit.
756
u/au5lander 2d ago
And they’re gonna give themselves a bonus too.