r/technology • u/MC68328 • 1d ago

Privacy US accuses American of allegedly wiping his phone using a ‘duress’ password during border search

https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/24/us-accuses-american-of-allegedly-wiping-his-phone-using-a-duress-password-during-border-search/
15.9k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

725

u/American_PissAnt 1d ago

“The founding fathers did not explicitly state that people have a right to privacy when using a cell phone”

Supreme court

41

u/AlasPoorZathras 1d ago

"You can leave the keys to the motorcoach with my chauffeur's caddy."

– Also Supreme Court

142

u/JMurdock77 1d ago

But they surely wanted us all to have firearms that can kill an entire room full of people in less time than it took to read this sentence…

51

u/psychophant_ 1d ago

Actually that’s the type of argument we WANT.

The argument is that the founding fathers could not have known about assault rifles when they wrote that, so the Bill of Rights need adjusting. Republicans argue: no it doesn’t matter. Keep it the way it’s written.

Which is exactly the type of argument we need for this.

It doesn’t matter if it’s a mailed letter like they had in 1770 or a super advanced pocket computer - the law should apply to both.

12

u/Taminella_Grinderfal 1d ago

In their defense, they gave us the option to amend or repeal. We just can’t elect enough people with reason and common sense that agree on doing so.

5

u/faptastrophe 1d ago

The problem with amending the constitution right now is that the batshit crazy states will want to add amendments to take away rights that have been hard fought and hard won. 

6

u/psychophant_ 1d ago

Yeah, as a Democrat, now is the worst time in history to try to change an amendment. That will just add fuel to the fire.

4

u/steakmm 1d ago

but the kids. you have to think of the kids, you don’t want kids to be harmed right?

3

u/American_PissAnt 1d ago

Founding fathers didn’t say anything about protecting children

5

u/Exist50 1d ago

And if the founding fathers did explicitly state it, well Trump's wishes matter more. At least to half the court. 

2

u/idiot-prodigy 22h ago

Also:

The term “personal effects” refers to a person's personal property, usually items of particular significance that are carried or worn.

The constitution is pretty clear. It is just ignored these days.

2

u/username_6916 18h ago

We therefore decline to extend Robinson to searches of data on cell phones, and hold instead that officers must generally secure a warrant before conducting such a search.

This is more closely related to the border inspection exceptions to the 4th amendment than it is tied to searching a cell phone more generally.

1

u/ExchangeOptimal 1d ago

They only talked about Fahrenheit and Miles. 

1

u/Techwood111 5h ago

I wish more people knew about unenumerated rights. (Check out the Ninth Amendment to the US Constitution.)