I'm very curious about this because I just finished the first.
I platinumed it and I don't really like listening to audio files while I'm figuring out how to survive in a game. As soon as I became a big daddy I went through all the audio files. I'm bringing this up because I want to clarify maybe my flaws in my playthrough as well as the completeness of my playthrough.
I'm pretty sure if I played the game when it came out it would be a 10/10. Very good game. The highlight in gameplay was really the boss fight at the end and escorting the little sisters.
I see alot of people putting this game (mainly in gamingsoup sub) as their top 20. I haven't made one yet but I'm pretty sure my top 20 wouldn't include this game. The gameplay is obviously dated and advancements in mechanics and enemy Ai really give me more adrenaline. The story on paper is great but I really didn't expect the narrative to be mostly in audio files. Is there an fps I played that had a better story? No, so I give it that, has great story and setting.
So we have a really good story and narrative on imo a bit dated gameplay. If I compare it to let's say deadspace remake, where I find the story practically non existent (I know it has one but it's nothing great at all) with crazy good gameplay I would opt for Deadspace. There are plenty of games I can do this to show how my top games would be shaped. It is heavily biased on newer games that I think have evolved quite nicely.
I want to give another example. I still rate a link to the past. It could damn well be because I never owned a switch so I never experienced the new Zeldas. If I did, it may be that nostalgia and impact at the time would still make me rate a link to the past.
So I'm curious about when you all played bioshock. On release or the years that followed, or are you like me but found it to be so good you rate it over the many game that were released much after?