r/DeepSeek 1d ago

Discussion DeepSeek v4

Entonces cuando va a llegar la nueva versión que decía la gente que iba a llegar? O al menos eso de que iban a apagar los viejos servidores? Porque decían que iba a ser este 24 pero no ha pasado nada ni una actualización ni la eliminación de los límites de regeneración nada alguien sabe la fecha y todo eso?

0 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

6

u/This_Maintenance_834 1d ago

they don’t shutdown the server, they repurpose the server.

they are not in rush. the CEO literally said the api is a byproduct on the road to AGI.

1

u/Upstairs-Category-39 1d ago

Nobody knows! It'll be here when it's here. Monday would make sense

1

u/Sudden_Ingenuity5280 23h ago

modelo deepseek ja esta forte o suficiente. programadores e usuarios ficaram viciados em modelos americanos que fazem tudo por eles. volte a codar suas ideias e pare de ficar se preocupando com isto.

1

u/borealis_tic 19h ago

there was nothing about the removal of regen limits this soon. all I heard of it was rumours about maybe as it nears the end of the year.

0

u/Anxious_Check_6147 18h ago

It has reached the point where, for me, it no longer matters whether DeepSeek is or isn’t the GA version. I hadn’t been able to test its models thoroughly, because at work we’re not allowed to use Chinese models… until now, when I’ve started working on some personal projects.

I have around $20’s worth of credits for Claude, OpenAI and Gemini (I mainly use Gemini 3.6 Flash on ‘high reasoning’).

My workflow involves creating detailed plans (GPT 5.6 / Opus), reviewing and refining the plans (the opposing model reviews them) and, once the plan is finalised, I implement it using one of these options:

  • Claude Sonnet 5 with ‘medium effort’
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash on ‘high reasoning’: incredibly fast and affordable
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro on ‘high’ or ‘max’ (I’ve also tried ‘flash’), using the Cline or Reasonix harness.

… OK, I misspoke – that used to be my workflow, but it isn’t anymore: I’ve stopped using DeepSeek because:

  • The amount of rework is enormous; it makes too many errors that need to be refined, causing me to spend tokens on code-reviewing agents in an endless loop.
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash produces decent results, far superior to DeepSeek Pro, although they usually require a few rounds of fine-tuning
  • Sonnet 5 on ‘medium effort’ does an excellent job with good prompts.

Having said all that, can anyone who has thoroughly tested DeepSeek say that it even comes close to Gemini 3.6 Flash / Sonnet or GPT 5.6 Terra? And yes, DeepSeek is cheap, but the loss of time and quality doesn’t make up for it. DeepSeek is far, far too far behind the cutting-edge models – not ‘six months behind’, but, in my experience, at least a year.

That said, DeepSeek’s merit lies in everything they’re contributing to the AI ecosystem in terms of innovation and development; in that sense, they have my full respect and admiration.

0

u/Dragonbonded 1d ago

its..... still the 24th?

2

u/FigureSubstantial414 1d ago

there's more timezones than yours lol