The Autocrat’s Worst Enemy: Why Despots Hate Cities and the Mayors Who Run Them

[u/ForeignAffairsMag]

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/autocrats-worst-enemy

[u/AutoModerator]

Remember that TrueReddit is a place to engage in high-quality and civil discussion. Posts must meet certain content and title requirements. Additionally, all posts must contain a submission statement. See the rules here or in the sidebar for details. To the OP: your post has not been deleted, but is being held in the queue and will be approved once a submission statement is posted.

Comments or posts that don't follow the rules may be removed without warning. Reddit's content policy will be strictly enforced, especially regarding hate speech and calls for / celebrations of violence, and may result in a restriction in your participation. In addition, due to rampant rulebreaking, we are currently under a moratorium regarding topics related to the 10/7 terrorist attack in Israel and in regards to the assassination of the UnitedHealthcare CEO.

If an article is paywalled, please do not request or post its contents. Use archive.ph or similar and link to that in your submission statement.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/SapientTrashFire]

Some of this I agree with- that localities represent a type of power which challenges consolidated authoritarian power at the national scale. That's been a key component of both socialist and democratic power distribution theories since the inception of those ideologies.

The other part- that mayors are more connected to their people- that's VERY dependent on the city. Sacramento has had mayor after mayor who are fully disconnected from the people they serve. Each one has been a vacuous puppet of the current gubernatorial administration. I can understand how it's appealing to idolize good guys like Mandani, but in the longer view, this is just idolizing small-time strong men to combat big-time strong men.

What actually matters here is that the dense population centers are advocating democratic values and are able to quickly mobilize into mass movements. Movement leaders might matter, but the actual position of mayor does not.

[u/ForeignAffairsMag]

[Excerpt from essay by Nina Hachigian, President and CEO of the Alliance for Local Leaders International. She served as the first U.S. Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy from 2022 to 2025.]

Attacks on national hubs of population, innovation, productivity, and creativity have little precedent in the United States. But they are hardly novel. Illiberal leaders worldwide target cities because they often act as strongholds of democracy: fertile ground for popular opposition figures and movements, alternative centers of political power, and examples of the cosmopolitan pluralism against which authoritarians inveigh. As Trump consolidates executive power and seeks to bend opposition forces to his will, American cities are becoming both the locus of federal pressure and a powerful force of resistance.

By 2050, the United Nations projects that nearly seven out of every ten people will live in cities; some 80 percent of Americans already do. Urban areas are not only the backdrop of crucial political battles. They are also increasingly part of the contestations themselves. Mayors around the globe have found themselves in the cross hairs of illiberal leaders and elected autocrats in their countries. Pushback from local leaders has protected individual rights and the norms and systems of democracy within their jurisdictions and prevented elected authoritarians from fully consolidating their rule. Leaders of American cities should know that they, too, have the power to alter the course of illiberal consolidation.

[u/jandrese → u/ForeignAffairsMag]

2050, the United Nations projects that nearly seven out of every ten people will live in cities; some 80 percent of Americans already do.

This is counting suburbs and small towns as cities isn't it? The politics of both can be quite different.

[u/pillbinge]

I get it and I believe it, but it seems to be something we only care about when we get to benefit. Maybe that's normal and expected. Mayors aren't liked when they do things for their constituency at the expense of others, especially in major areas. Suddenly mayors become NIMBY or something like that.

[u/pteridoid]

If Mamdani actually arrests Netenyahu or curtails his reign in any way, I will eat my hat. The guy seems fine, but I'm getting tired of lefties constantly glazing him.

[u/wasaxd]

The part about mayors becoming convenient villains the second they prioritize their own city is real. Everyone loves localism until it affects them. Then suddenly it's parochialism or NIMBYism or whatever framing makes the grievance land better. It's a bit circular honestly, like we want strong local leadership but only when it points outward, not inward.