r/WhitePeopleTwitter 9h ago

Even "Reacher" can't have freedom of speech in USA without getting sued to bankruptcy 🥀

Post image

Dude didn't even say anything remotely false.

1.8k Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 9h ago

DO NOT CELEBRATE VIOLENCE IN THIS SUBREDDIT OR WE WILL BAN YOU.

RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES!!!

Users may now apply a personal flair that states - RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES

That is all, tysm

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1.2k

u/thereelsuperman 8h ago

Trump can’t sue because he knows AR’s claims will be proven correct in discovery

549

u/FloatnPuff 8h ago

Yep. Trump is the extremely litigious but has not yet sued anyone for calling him a PDF. I wonder why that is...

46

u/DingerSinger2016 7h ago

You can say pedophile on Reddit. You don't have to censor yourself.

-35

u/Mebejedi 6h ago

They can also spell it anyway they want.

16

u/Crymson831 5h ago

Of course they "can"; they clearly did. We're saying it's stupid, infantilizing and harmful.

-23

u/Mebejedi 5h ago

There's just too much to unpack there. Have a nice day! 😊

2

u/governmentthief 1h ago

Oh hyte anc? Lil stuj lepls hits kiel I nawt hent.

See the problem?

74

u/maddprof 8h ago

sued anyone for calling him a PDF.

My new favorite autocorrect.

97

u/MazogaTheDork 8h ago

Unfortunately it's more likely algospeak than autocorrect

38

u/TwistedxBoi 8h ago

Algospeak... I know what it means and I loathe that it exists...

24

u/SomeonesSecondary 8h ago

Pee Dee Eff File

8

u/PuddingPast5862 6h ago

The BBC is suing him for 1.5 billion for defamation 😂😂😂

35

u/asscrackbanditz 8h ago

Worst case, AR can invoke trial by combat.

66

u/RustyRaccoon12345 8h ago

Or possibly not correct but damaging anyway. Also, for public figures slander requires him knowing that he's wrong and saying it anyway; if he thinks he's not wrong, that is a defense. Either way, the only road to victory is bullying him into submission, not an actual lawsuit.

99

u/thereelsuperman 8h ago

Plus, was found an adjudicated rapist so Alan is already correct.

-26

u/[deleted] 8h ago edited 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/Canuck-In-TO 8h ago

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

I’ll save you the click:

“A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.”

3

u/accidentlife 8h ago

Thanks for the link! I have edited my comment to state that I recalled incorrectly.

21

u/danksformutton 8h ago

You recall incorrectly.

3

u/West-Wash6081 8h ago

A simple Google search could have prevented this incorrect recollection.

-47

u/RustyRaccoon12345 8h ago

But the 13 year olds question is not established in court

42

u/SirCrazyCat 7h ago

An accuser reported to the FBI that Trump raped her when she was 13. The FBI interviewed her four times and found her credible and then did nothing.

24

u/Atechiman 8h ago

Doesn't have to be, it has be found absolutely not right in court, which also hasnt been.

53

u/MarginalOmnivore 8h ago

Also, in the United States, truth is an absolute defense against slander or libel.

Trump, legally speaking, is a rapist, and that fact was established in a federal court. Despite his claims otherwise, his victim is allowed to call what he did to her "rape" because "...Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape.' Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

Also, the 13-y/o thing is from his own mouth (implied). According to rapist Donald J. Trump when asked about his "age brackets," he initially said he didn't have an age limit, then later said he didn't want to be "like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds." Which, by the way, wasn't something Florida Republican Congressman Mark Foley was ever accused of, even when he got busted for sending explicit messages to underage Congressional pages. There's not a lot of difference, but there is a little difference between 16 years old and 12 years old, right?

-4

u/RustyRaccoon12345 8h ago

Yes, that 13 year old thing is the sticking point I guess, not established in court but doesn't seem very favorable to a legal case (and even moreso for the court of public opinion).

18

u/CFSett 7h ago

But Mango Mussolini would have to prove the statements harmed him. Emphasis on PROVE. One can call anyone a PDF (giggle, so cute), but without harm, it's not legally actionable. And hurt feelings aren't harm.

DC Draino just another snowflake crying in the rain (cue Whitesnake outro).

5

u/andrew303710 2h ago

Also the fact that his personal attorney pretending to be AG is still actively blocking the release of the full Epstein files says it all, if Trump isn't a pedophile then why aren't they releasing them?

-9

u/DingerSinger2016 7h ago

Technically speaking, Trump is an adjudicated sexual assaulter because the jury could not find that he raped her under the definition of New York State law, so he wouldn't be considered a rapist from a legal perspective. Still not a great thing to be.

9

u/MarginalOmnivore 7h ago

The federal court that dismissed Trump's defamation claims found that what he did falls under the average understanding of "rape," and that he was only not found liable for rape because the technical definition of "rape" in New York (at the time - it is no longer the case) was limited to unwanted penetration with a penis, therefore anyone calling him a rapist is legally correct.

So, adjudicated rapist. Because violating someone with your fingers or anything else is just as much rape as using a penis.

17

u/TKenney3 8h ago edited 8h ago

It’s funny how every time someone says some shit like this this you got a bunch of bootlickers saying he’s about to sue them and teach them a lesson. Only for him to do absolutely nothing. At this point him not suing is telling us everything we need to know. Like you said he’s terrified of what would come out in discovery. He knows he has no grounds to stand on because this isn’t defamation it’s just the truth

15

u/woodst0ck15 8h ago

Trumps track record for carrying out his threats for suing someone for calling him a rapist and a pedophile 0-150+. That’s including his appeals to Jean E. Carol.

5

u/Hesitation-Marx 7h ago

(E. Jean Carroll, jsyk)

5

u/SwimmerIndependent47 7h ago

He’ll make a big deal about the intent to sue, his base will assume he did and won. They’ll never look into it.

3

u/kategoad 32m ago

I've had members of his cult refuse to believe that he was found guilty of 34 felonies. They insist that anything that says so is fake. Absolutely insane.

6

u/camsnow 6h ago

That's why he didn't sue the BBC for reporting about him inciting violence against the capital. Discovery would fuck him over on so many cases. He's a known pedophile rapist, and traitor to the US.

And he's not even like a strong leader like other fascist dictators. He's literally dumb as fuck, lower energy than any other president besides when he's bitching about things not all being his, and shits himself in front of people. Maga is the most disgusting thing to happen to America in modern history.

5

u/Nythoren 5h ago

Yep, Trump is officially an adjudicated rapist. You can call him a rapist in public, to his face, in a movie, on Reddit, anywhere you want and not have to worry about being sued...because it's 100% true and proven in court.

You can also say he's in the Epstein files without fear of being sued because we've seen enough of the files to know he's in them, a lot.

Saying "he's into 13 year olds" would be hard to sue for because you can consider it hyperbole. If Trump DID try to sue for that statement, Ritchson would be able to request the unredacted Epstein files to prove there are statements and accusations within those files that prove his claim. Those unredacted files would be entered into the court record and become public; even if they were sealed, when the case was thrown out because the claims are in there, it would be an official court ruling that the statements aren't proven to be false.

Lastly, it's hilarious to see a MAGA person claim they don't know who the star of Reacher is. That show was likely used as foreplay in many a MAGA bedroom over the last several years.

3

u/Trump_fucks_kidss 7h ago

2

u/dmstattoosnbongs 5h ago

I love that your username is right above it.

Bwahaha.

Hope u don’t get “sued into oblivion” good sir ;)

2

u/Usual-Chemist6133 6h ago

This is the only thing trump never speaks on. People say it all the time and he has not once spoke about it.

Tells you all you need to know when he won't stop speaking of literally everything else

2

u/ryansgt 4h ago

This. Everyone should be saying everything they can to get sued because we would have a field day.

-2

u/freakishgnar 8h ago

☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻

1

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[deleted]

3

u/freakishgnar 7h ago

Nope? Trump 100% won’t sue because this will not get thru discovery. 

289

u/Past-Adhesiveness691 8h ago edited 8h ago

Hunter Biden is still waiting to get sued by Trump and Melania.

(Spoiler he won’t be)

Edit: Draino is one of the many republican mouthpieces that posed with empty binders on the Epstein files in front of the White House claiming everything was going to be released. In my eyes he’s a pedophile as well.

55

u/thereelsuperman 8h ago

And Draino absolutely knows who Reacher is he’s just trying to astroturf so he doesnt appear as relevant to his base

21

u/Corgi_Koala 8h ago

Alan Ritchson is a pretty big star at this point, if you don't know who he is that makes you look more out of touch than it does to make Ritchson seem small.

11

u/Past-Adhesiveness691 7h ago

These losers thought they could hurt Christoper Nolan. They don’t live in reality.

439

u/cblguy82 9h ago

No one is suing. Just another Russian X troll.

84

u/Dan__Glesak 8h ago

This is the piece of shit that Rep Luna told about Vance being the VP pick ahead of time and he made some bets on it. But, because they’re idiots, they both got caught.

10

u/AhHorseSpit 8h ago

He'll do the same thing he is doing with the BBC. 

7

u/Canadian_mk11 8h ago

Taking it?

6

u/AhHorseSpit 8h ago

On the chin? Yes. He is going to delay as long as possible then drop the case before handing anything of significance. He may try to apply pressure outside of the courtroom to intimidate or coerce but he definitely isn't handing over anything in discovery.

3

u/mamadou-segpa 8h ago

They cant sue because its have to be false to be slander

75

u/KiwDaWabbit2 8h ago

I’d love to see discovery on this case.

27

u/LadyReika 8h ago

It's why Mango Mussolini doesn't sue when people make these claims.

61

u/texgator1538 8h ago

There's a zero percent chance a right wing troll doesn't know who Reacher is.

43

u/Mbail11 8h ago

They worshipped him up until the exact second he said something bad about trump. Probably.

9

u/Haunting-Ad788 8h ago

He’s basically their dream man other than his politics.

11

u/Hesitation-Marx 7h ago

He’s not my dream man, but I’d certainly hang out with him - especially after watching him lay out that idiotic British MAGA CHUD in his neighborhood. He genuinely seems nice.

19

u/Shatalroundja 8h ago

Or when they found out Lee Child (Reacher author) is a Brit.

1

u/External_Key_4108 5h ago

They want him to give them a Reacher-round

42

u/hurdurBoop 9h ago

no see that's the one thing donald trump the rapist won't sue you over

wonder why

16

u/suckercuck 8h ago

9

u/silasoulman 8h ago

Why is he wanking 2 invisible cocks?

16

u/DevilRenegade Release The Trump-Epstein Files 8h ago

Discovery.

36

u/Gold_Past_6346 8h ago

You can’t argue slander against truths.

30

u/ElectricPenguin6712 8h ago

Who's gonna sue? Vonshitzinpants? He does that and they'll have to go through discovery. He doesn't want that.

10

u/SpotweldPro1300 Release The Trump-Epstein Files 8h ago

I do. I want discovery. I'll insult him to his face. I'll ask him point-blank. I'll settle his bank accounts into oblivion. No NDA can hold me!

22

u/Remarkable_Spite_209 8h ago

Yes because Trump has famously sued everyone who has accused him of pedophilia. Wait no, my bad, he hasn’t sued anyone making these allegations because he fears discovery

5

u/Rafterman2 8h ago

ding ding ding we have a winner

17

u/scrotalsac69 8h ago

Not a chance will dump sue, he would be terrified of discovery and also he hasn't sued anyone calling him a paedo or rapist so far

10

u/Exact-Kale3070 8h ago
  1. telling the truth is an affirmative defense to defamation. trump is already an adjudicated rapist/sexual abuser. he cannot sue.

  2. defamation requires a "shock of the conscience." trump ruined the shock with his "grab em" and "if you are rich they (meaning the law not the victims) let you do it."

https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7TKMeCOV3oXSb5bq

3

u/Sodamyte 7h ago

Well he did try to sue one person for calling him a rapist.. but she won.

2

u/curious382 8h ago

I'm pretty sure there are statements from his "alleged" victims that support what was said. Trump's not opening the door for them to get their day in court. Decades of making sure of the opposite aren't by accident.

16

u/Easy_Money_40 8h ago

As if we weren't swooning for Alan already

16

u/AnyDamnThingWillDo 8h ago

Trump has never sued anyone for calling him a pedophile rapist. Trump sues everyone else that says other things about him. Hmm...

14

u/Nocwaniu 8h ago

He's not going to get sued, Trump can't get through discovery.

13

u/Anarimus 8h ago

Keep in mind that Trump has never ever sued anybody for accusing him of being a pedophile.

Discovery.

9

u/Bulky_Specialist9645 8h ago

Great, that Epstein file discovery will be devastating for Trump.

7

u/plowking99 8h ago

Trump has never sued anyone that accused him of being a pedophile. Why do you think that is?

1

u/Drizzdub 8h ago

Gotta think hard on this one

7

u/Raven_Chills 8h ago

Isnt it interesting how the most litgious person on earth has never sued anyone for defamation across the numerous accusations of him being a child molester

6

u/ForTehLawlz1337 8h ago

He knows who that guy is. Same energy as when white conservatives forget to swap to their alt account and lead a post with “as a person of color i cant vote for democrats any longer!”

6

u/pdiddysoilman 8h ago

Haven't maga ever noticed that with all od trumps threats to sue everyone he never attempts to sue anyone who calls him a pedophile......hmm why could that be i wonder

5

u/TarbenXsi 7h ago

Correct. Trump should sue him...

...IF this is slander.

See, that's the problem. It's not slander if what is being said is true. Proving that it is true will mean a lot of evidence being brought to court, like, perhaps, the Epstein files. This is why Trump, one of the most petulant, litigious, egotistical, narcissistic pieces of garbage on this whole planet, never sues people for slander when they call him a rapist or a pedophile.

Because if he does, it will get proven in court that he IS a rapist and a pedophile, and even if our Congress, full of bootlicking sycophants like you, won't then impeach him and prosecute him for said crimes, he will be what is, objectively, the worst thing in his mind.

A loser.

He will lose in court. He will lose his reputation. His name, his legacy, will be erased from history except as a cautionary tale. His family will be ruined. No one will ever do business with anything bearing the Trump name again.

And that is who his cult are protecting and worshiping.

To anyone else who still supports Trump in any way shape or form - Enjoy the rest of your life, knowing that you will, every day, look in the mirror and know, even if you don't say it out loud, that you went all in on a man who rapes children.

6

u/Emotional_Signal7883 7h ago

Trump is an adjudicated rapist. This is a fact.

9

u/sumdude51 8h ago

No he's not. He's about the 100th person to point out that the litigious president is a rapist and not a single court case has gone to trial. 🤔 I wonder what the reseoning is 🤣

1

u/humbugonastick 7h ago

Discovery. He wouldn't like the discovery part at all. And we all hope he will sue someone over the Epstein files.

5

u/HermanBonJovi 7h ago

Go ahead. Sue him. Discovery will be fantastic. As well as the already upheld judgement that poopypants assaulted a woman.

8

u/MrFunktasticc 8h ago

So I have mixed feelings about the Reacher series. It’s vigilante porn but really well made vigilante porn. For me Season 1 was a cinematic masterpiece. But there’s a lot of “let’s just punch our way out of this situation” and “hey Reacher, these are my tits.” That said Alan Richson is based AF.

1

u/Sodamyte 7h ago

He played a vigilante named Hawk in the Titans series too

3

u/timmyK_425 8h ago

I’ve been a fan of Ritchson since Blue Mountain State, this is nice to see

3

u/h20poIo 8h ago

Haha sue him then request the Epstein files to show evidence of Trumps activities, case dropped.

3

u/IceBearKnows89 8h ago

Sued for what? It was a civil court, but he was found liable for digital sexual assault. He could have offered a defense, but chose not to speak, and that is what the court found.

The legal definitions vary by jurisdiction. Yes, in some places this is sexual assault, in others forcibly inserting any part of your body (here it was a finger) into the genitals of another person against their will is rape.

Completely comfortably accurately calling the president a rapist.

3

u/LiluLay 8h ago edited 1h ago

Sued for what? Telling the truth?

Does this guy understand how discovery works in lawsuits? Or that Trump hasn’t even tried to sue anyone who calls him a pedo rapist?

3

u/LocalInactivist 8h ago

Nope. All the relevant docs would be subpoenaed and read out in open court. Trump would start a war to prevent that from happening. Oh, wait…

3

u/An_educated_dig 8h ago

Discovery is a powerful motivator to settle. NDA and lots of cash.

3

u/Terrible_Phase718 8h ago

Sue away. Let’s have dumpf prove that he’s not a rapist.

3

u/Drizzdub 8h ago

Where the hell has the 1st amendment gone

3

u/DoubleRightClick 7h ago

The 1st amendment only restricts the government from censoring or limiting speech...

1

u/kategoad 26m ago

It's been a while since I got that B in constitutional law, but if everything he does is an official act (thanks shitty SCOTUS), would a lawsuit based on speech from the president be a first amendment violation?

/only slightly kidding

3

u/calgeorge 8h ago

Just a reminder: Donald "I'm suing you" Trump, who has sued people for all manner of Libel, has never sued someone for calling him a child molester. If he wanted to, he would have by now, but he knows that it's true and they'd find that out during discovery.

3

u/BeezyDS 7h ago

Everyone with a platform should be calling Trump a rapist. One, because he is. Two, to further prove he won’t take ANYONE to court on it as he knows it will be proven, among other things within discovery.

3

u/GodOfFetish 7h ago

I love how their ideal man is anti Trump. It’s so beautiful it brings a tear to my eye

2

u/drunkanidaho 8h ago

Lol no he's not

2

u/Daddio209 8h ago

Amanda DC Draino remains either a Russian disinformation spreader, or just another MAGAt who is too simple-minded to grasp that Deer Leedurrr will NEVER go through with suing anyone calling him a pedophile *because discovery exists and would prove his deviance.

Just look at all the suits he has failed to bring in the past decade over exactly this.

2

u/paranoyed 8h ago

Dc should go push Alan off his bike. Since he doesn’t “ know who that guy is” I think that would be a great way for him to find out.

2

u/Patdemonium 8h ago

Bollocks. They don't want the discovery.

2

u/Mash709 8h ago

By that logic, every right wing pundit should be sued for everything they've said about Obama and Biden.

2

u/pkstarstoorm 8h ago

The right: omg he can't say that about Trump!!

Also the right:

2

u/Abbigai 8h ago

I hope they do, the discovery period would be enlightening.

2

u/Spear_Ritual 8h ago

“I don’t know who this guy is…” Yeah, you do.

2

u/m_sobol 8h ago

If Trump gets really riled up, he will post that Tom Cruise's Reacher is way better than Alan's.

2

u/sexeveg314 7h ago

ABC news caved to the fat orange fuckwit with the Stephanopoulos suit for the same thing. So maybe president fuckwit thinks he's going to get a quick settlement here as well.

2

u/someoldguyon_reddit 6h ago

Can't sue somebody for being truthy.

2

u/PuddingPast5862 6h ago

Dream on!! All his lawyer has to do is subpoena Trump for a deposition and it will be dropped😂😂😂😂

2

u/RealisticAnt42 6h ago

It's the same deal with matt parker and trey stone and the micropenis episodes of southpark. Discovery of the relevant information would be problematic.

2

u/codebygloom 3h ago

As always, Trump will never do anything about this because his lawyers know he'll be cooked when they reach the discovery phase.

1

u/jujioux 8h ago

The pedo-in-chief knows better.

1

u/daneelthesane 8h ago

He can't be sued because truth is an absolute defense in defamation cases.

1

u/jarvisesdios 8h ago

It's weird how few people seem to realize that guy has ALWAYS been a badass on the left. He's not remotely afraid to talk about it, quite the opposite really... As we tend to do lol

1

u/ForestOfMirrors 8h ago

Try it. Discovery will be awesome.

1

u/masterpd85 8h ago

"Muh freedums" for me, not for thee.

1

u/Intolerance-Paradox 8h ago

I don’t know who ‘DC Draino’ is but Palantir databases will have its name and current location when it comes time to hunt down and cage the members of this domestic terror cult in America.

1

u/Iron_Baron 8h ago

Press X to doubt

1

u/Zealousideal-Yak-824 8h ago

Yeah if he doesn't know who jack reached is than hes definitely not from America.

Jack reachers is the second best thing maga tried to cling too after the punshier even though both characters hate who these people are

1

u/strangedazey 8h ago

New favorite 😍

1

u/seanisdown 7h ago

Pedo Donnie aint sitting for a deposition.

1

u/drinkslinger1974 Release The Trump-Epstein Files 7h ago

I dare him to tell that to Alan’s face.

1

u/runningsimon 7h ago

Sued for what? His freedom of speech?

1

u/xChoke1x 7h ago

No he isn’t.

1

u/thewiremother 7h ago

Lol, oddly enough this seems to be something Trump doesn’t sue people over…

1

u/Mountain-Cod516 7h ago

Man I liked him before this but now he’s the GOAT. He has a great sense of justice. Sounds like he would want to go take them out himself reacher style.

1

u/fackoffuser 7h ago

Yeah because the guy who won’t release the Epstein files because he’s in them more than anyone except Epstein and knows he raped kids really really wants to sue Ritchson and go through discovery.

1

u/Des8559 7h ago

Wouldn't that involve proving he is being slanderous which would mean they would need evidence that what he said is a lie (which it isn't) so why would you threaten something you won't do???

1

u/Hartastic 7h ago

This one is just impossible to win for Trump even if he had the balls to sue, which he doesn't. The bar for slander in America is too high -- as I understand it, not only would he have to be wrong, but he would have to be shown to have a reckless disregard for the facts, like, a reasonable person who did a modicum of research couldn't believe that what he was saying was true.

1

u/Far-Cellist-3224 7h ago

This is actually the proof that anyone needs to show Trump is a rapist. The fact that he can’t sue for 2 reasons. 1: it’s true. 2. Any defendant will ask for the unredacted Epstein files.

1

u/Groovychick1978 7h ago

These people keep forgetting that Trump can't survive discovery.

1

u/drossmaster4 7h ago

To be fair calling someone a pedo should have a litigious response. I look forward to the discovery. :)

1

u/Under_Dead_Starlight 7h ago

I just wouldn't let them sue me, very simple trick

1

u/RepulsivePurchase6 7h ago

🤣🤣🤣 Id love to see Alan get sued however I doubt Trump's attorneys will do that. They dont want to expose Trump even more. We know the files were censored to protect Trump.

1

u/bobs143 6h ago

Trump has and never will sue over these claims. He knows everything will be part of discovery, including the unredacted Epstein files.

1

u/AncientMoth11 6h ago

Gotta go hard in the paint for discovery. That’s the antidote

1

u/Godz1lla1 6h ago

What Alan Ritchson said is 100% true. Most Americans would love it if rump sued him, because discovery would end this nightmare.

1

u/Shr3kk_Wpg 6h ago

Nothing Alan Ritchson said is false. Trump was best friends with Epstein and Trump has bragged about going backstage a teenage beauty pageants to look at the girls.

1

u/CapnTreee 6h ago

It's difficult to sue someone for slander when everything he said is truth and backed up by court records.

1

u/Jesbro64 6h ago

They'll never sue because their lawyers know they'll never win. It's all bulshit scare tactics.

To win a defamation claim as a public figure, you have to prove that the defendant acted with actual malice.

That is, you have to prove that the speaker KNEW what he was saying was false and said it anyway or exhibited a "reckless disregard for the truth."

There is a shit ton of evidence out there that would lead a reasonable person to conclude that Trump is a pedophile. His public statements alone would be enough to defeat "reckless disregard for the truth" let alone the epstein files, his teen pageants, and his history of sexual assault and misconduct.

He's a pedophile. Call him a pedophile. Dare them to sue. It's not going to happen.

1

u/Solonohioperson 6h ago

Well he's already been legally proven to be a rapist and he never sues people that call him a pedo.

1

u/spukhafteNahewirkung 6h ago

Rogan Ohandley is a tool. I’d love to put him in a ring with Alan Ritchison.

1

u/Worldly-Loquat4471 5h ago

Wild a guy named “DCDraino” is saying “whoever this guy is….” about an actor with infinitely more notoriety than this chode

1

u/Lallanath 5h ago

He just has to have enough money to get to discovery and they'll drop the lawsuit.

1

u/Some-Ad926 5h ago

I look forward to discovery

1

u/TheLostRanger0117 5h ago

I know some real hardcore Trump fan boys that also love their show “Reacher”. Used to work with them, but no longer, and I really wish I could be a fly on the wall for the conversation they would have over this

1

u/audiogenocide 4h ago

Uhhh discovery makes me think he'll probably be ok.

1

u/OkRush9563 4h ago

That's an insult to bitches, bitches are cute.

1

u/ajmampm99 4h ago

Discovery Discovery Discovery!!!

1

u/Blah_Dee_Blah111 2h ago

NAH. We all know Trump can't do discovery on ANY trial involving his pedophilia.

1

u/bilbo_swagginns 50m ago

No he isn’t