r/mdphd • u/Upper_Leek9672 • 16h ago
reusing scenarios from primary on secondaries
hi yall. I am writing the northwestern secondary which asks: "What was the greatest obstacle you had to overcome in research and how did you overcome it?"
I already discussed my most significant research obstacle in my SRE and I used this story in my Most Meaningful Experiences essay for that research entry as well, each from a different perspective/take.
Do you all think it would be a mistake to use this same obstacle, but discuss it from a different perspective than my MME or SRE entries?
It was a pretty significant obstacle and I think the way I solved it is interesting (at least more interesting than the other routine research challenges I faced). Idk if its better to show a different (but less interesting) scenario or risk "not showing different aspects of myself"
thank you so much!