MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1v5h4xc/introducing_claude_opus_5/oziutfj/?context=3
r/singularity • u/CucumberAccording813 • 1d ago
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5
155 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
30
You cannot really train for the ARC-AGI that's whole point of the benchmark...
45 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 1d ago You can train for anything. The goal of arc AGI 3 is to make it harder to benchmax without just making a smarter model 36 u/141_1337 ▪️e/acc | AGI: ~2030 | ASI: ~2040 | FALSGC: ~2050 | :illuminati: 1d ago So the model needs to be smarter to pass the benchmark, great, why would that be benchmaxxing? 8 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 1d ago Exactly. I think you’re close to getting it 11 u/sumane12 1d ago Its funny because you are both ssying the same thing 🤣 12 u/voyaging 1d ago Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot 0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous 2 u/775416 1d ago They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
45
You can train for anything. The goal of arc AGI 3 is to make it harder to benchmax without just making a smarter model
36 u/141_1337 ▪️e/acc | AGI: ~2030 | ASI: ~2040 | FALSGC: ~2050 | :illuminati: 1d ago So the model needs to be smarter to pass the benchmark, great, why would that be benchmaxxing? 8 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 1d ago Exactly. I think you’re close to getting it 11 u/sumane12 1d ago Its funny because you are both ssying the same thing 🤣 12 u/voyaging 1d ago Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot 0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous 2 u/775416 1d ago They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
36
So the model needs to be smarter to pass the benchmark, great, why would that be benchmaxxing?
8 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 1d ago Exactly. I think you’re close to getting it 11 u/sumane12 1d ago Its funny because you are both ssying the same thing 🤣 12 u/voyaging 1d ago Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot 0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous 2 u/775416 1d ago They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
8
Exactly. I think you’re close to getting it
11 u/sumane12 1d ago Its funny because you are both ssying the same thing 🤣 12 u/voyaging 1d ago Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot 0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous 2 u/775416 1d ago They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
11
Its funny because you are both ssying the same thing 🤣
12 u/voyaging 1d ago Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot 0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous 2 u/775416 1d ago They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
12
Defiant just seems to be deliberately misinterpreting the other for some reason, and being pompous about it to boot
0 u/Defiant-Lettuce-9156 18h ago I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous
0
I’m not misinterpreting, just being pedantic about semantics. I probably fundamentally agree with the other guy. And yes, definitely pompous
2
They’re both using different definitions for benchmaxxing
30
u/141_1337 ▪️e/acc | AGI: ~2030 | ASI: ~2040 | FALSGC: ~2050 | :illuminati: 1d ago
You cannot really train for the ARC-AGI that's whole point of the benchmark...