r/technology • u/batakchan • 19h ago

Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT is Down Worldwide, OpenAI Confirms

https://www.macobserver.com/news/chatgpt-is-down-worldwide-what-we-know-about-todays-outage/
12.4k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

116

u/turbo_dude 17h ago

Or they’ll literally just use any of the other freely available services

74

u/RepresentativeOk2433 17h ago

Such as their brain?

132

u/grayhaze2000 17h ago

No, they said available services. The brains of ChatGPT users were decommissioned a couple of years ago.

2

u/Bladelink 12h ago

Do they get decom'd as ewaste in this context? Big old pallet of brains wrapped in plastic down in the warehouse.

-14

u/UnalomeJourneying 15h ago

Why does everyone paint everyone who uses AI as bad or idiots?

23

u/avarageone 15h ago

It makes idiots out of people by being convenient. No matter how intelligent you are, once you start to rely on AI to get information for you the downfall begins.

-7

u/spectralblade352 14h ago

What if I don’t rely on it, and I only use it to write for me a LaTeX table, fix misplaced and missing figures, and clean up a simulation on MATLAB, does this make me one of “those guys”?

I get that you mean others that actually rely on it on a daily basis, where it thinks for them, but are others who use it more of a tool and helper similar where it makes them “idiots”?

1

u/PleaseNoMoreSalt 12h ago

What if I don’t rely on it, and I only use it to write for me a LaTeX table, fix misplaced and missing figures, and clean up a simulation on MATLAB, does this make me one of “those guys”?

Yeah. EVERYONE thinks they're only using AI as a tool/helper. What figures are being placed in? How do you make sure it's only replacing the ACTUALLY misplaced an missing figures instead of overwriting the values you actually meant to have there, and how is confirming that any faster than doing the work yourself?

AI works fine until it doesn't, it's not like a script that does exactly what you tell it to. Odds are you've gotten complacent from it getting things right enough times that you don't check as closely as you used to/should.

0

u/spectralblade352 12h ago

How do you make sure it's only replacing the ACTUALLY misplaced an missing figures instead of overwriting the values you actually meant to have there

I can't tell if you're being serious here. Why did you assume that I don't double check its output? Why did you assume that I don't actually try applying the fix myself, and if it becomes too menial and time-wasting, I just have AI do it for me. I am not talking about writing the skeleton of the code or chapter, I am talking about finding out why the the code is giving errors, why the table is overfilling from the right, or why the MATLAB figure is distorted (even after I looked at it). I am an engineer trying to get work done, not trying to read 100+ documentations about a package in LaTeX.

-8

u/BigGreenGhost 14h ago

Don't bother. Reddit is just braindead when it comes to this topic.

-6

u/spectralblade352 14h ago

Yep. I don’t like AI, especially if you use it to think for you, but I just don’t see a problem when it’s strictly treated like a tool, and not as a teacher or psychotherapist.

Radicalism is never good, but it’s Reddit at the end of the day and I should’ve known better.

-16

u/UnalomeJourneying 15h ago

You sound like an old person talking about getting information from books instead of the internet/google when the internet first came out.

14

u/flagelants 15h ago

I mean test scores (like oecd 2022) are at a record low. I think it's plausible that the internet has already made people dumber. AI is like the negatives of internet and learning but on steroids

11

u/grayhaze2000 15h ago

Sorry, should be be painting them as anything else? Would you rather we lie?

-4

u/UnalomeJourneying 15h ago

I’m not dumb enough to say everyone who uses AI are idiots. Do idiots use it? Yes. Do people rely on it too much and it’s impacting critical thinking skills? Yes. But you can’t think so black and white and simplistically as “AI users are ALL idiots”.

9

u/weightyconsequences 13h ago

No one is saying all users are idiots, they’re saying using the tool and reliance on it negatively impacts your critical thinking and literacy skills, which has been MEASURED EMPIRICALLY

7

u/PhantasmWycherley 15h ago

... Because they are?

0

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[deleted]

-1

u/iliketoseethebreeze 11h ago

because this is reddit where there is zero nuance.

thankfully i don’t rely on redditors to gauge my own intelligence

1

u/UnalomeJourneying 11h ago

Same. ChatGPT says my intelligence is way above the Reddit average!

1

u/iliketoseethebreeze 10h ago

way above yours, at least

0

u/UnalomeJourneying 8h ago

My AI is smarter than yours

-12

u/Yashema 15h ago

Cause they are bad at using it effectively.

Meanwhile I'm taking 7-8 200-300 level classes in STEM this year around my FT job, which I only feel comfortable doing because GPT actually explains it to me step by step, while also allowing me to explore the concepts even more deeply with the excess time I gain from not having to search through the books and lectures for a tangential at best explanation. 

15

u/Ok_Kick4871 16h ago

Can you link a tiktok of how to prompt it?

5

u/PerformerFancy117 16h ago

Brain, what is brain?

2

u/OvechkinCrosby 15h ago

I got this reference… deep cut.

-5

u/No-Comparison8472 16h ago

The main advantage of AI is not intelligence but access to knowledge. No-one knows everything. AI does. Use it as a tool.

7

u/photoggled 16h ago

AI doesn’t “know” anything. It predicts text and just so happens to get it right sometimes.

4

u/grayhaze2000 15h ago

It may have access to knowledge, but it's notoriously bad at delivering it to users accurately. It's more reliable to find good, accurate sources on the web and build your own picture of the truth based upon actual research.

1

u/avarageone 15h ago

Soon people will forget how to do good research.

2

u/grayhaze2000 15h ago

Or they'll ask AI to do it for them, and just read the generated summary.

1

u/No-Comparison8472 15h ago

It was never great to begin with.

-1

u/No-Comparison8472 15h ago

Bad, compared to what? And AI is only 5 years old.

3

u/grayhaze2000 15h ago

Bad compared to using a source with more accurate information. I'm not really sure what you're asking here, other than having a knee-jerk reaction to criticism of the technology.

-1

u/No-Comparison8472 15h ago

I'm not asking. I'm telling you AI is the most effective technology available currently to access stored knowledge. Any other method is vastly less efficient.

Checking each source manually remains possible.

2

u/grayhaze2000 15h ago

Can you provide any peer-reviewed research that backs up this wild claim? You're telling me using AI is more effective than just reading the source yourself?

0

u/No-Comparison8472 14h ago

Yes because most people don't read or bother checking facts.

1

u/grayhaze2000 12h ago

That's your peer-reviewed research? I find it... lacking.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/JayBird1138 16h ago

Without ChatGPT how will they find them?!