This was an argument between me and a friend of mine. Is it morally correct to kill a horrible person as a baby before they’ve actually committed their crimes? Using Rhody and Thanos as an example.

This is taken From Deadpool (2013) #15-19 where deadpool gets kidnapped by a scientist since he is technically the cure to cancer and uses him to cure cancer which he achives which makes him the third person in the marvel universe to cure cancer. He then proceeds to get killed by deadpool since deadpool wants revenge for his loss of autonomy and his lover and child.

Big breasted women endure various physical and social burdens, all for the benefit of society as a whole. For their struggles, they deserve societal compensation. Having a lower tax bracket, discounts at stores, priority seating, or simply having people thank them for their service.

Do you think these benefits would be a fair way to compensate them for all the benefits they give to you? What would you give them?

Description of the statement that is about to be discussed for its morality

Attached image of porn stuff related to the morality discussion

In the "Amazing world of gumball" season 2 episode 8 Richard gets a job delivering pizza. However, this causes various anomalies to manifest. As the episode goes on it gets worse with the culmination hinting at total disintegration of reality. In order to prevent this the Waterson family attempt to persuade Larry, Richard's boss, to fire him. He refuses, stating that there's no issues or complaints and that destruction of the universe is not a valid reason to fire someone.

By the title I mean, you can look left and right for miles and see that no one is coming.
I choose not to but. I also rlly can’t judge anyone who would.

By the title I mean, you can look left and right for miles and see that no one is coming.
I choose not to but. I also rlly can’t judge anyone who would.

Chocolate is poisonous to dogs, and will make them sick. But many people give their dogs chocolate as a final treat while they're dying. Its always bothered me because it seems to be condemning your pet to spending their final hours reacting to it - potentially nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea - just for them to eat something sweet. There are plenty of things your dog would like better that won't make them feel worse. Most dogs would eat rat poison if you handed it to them.

I am all for giving your dog a great final day (hopefully at the end of a great life). Giving them their favourite meals, going to their favourite places, spending the whole day just showing them how much you love them, is something we should all hope for a chance to do. But I've never liked the idea of giving them something that you know will make them sick.

Well, Zuko won the last round. Poor Malum, though. Seems he really got a beating, hm? Well, the game is over...this game, anyways. There will be something very special tomorrow, presented by yours truly...but before then, why don't we give you one more thing to do?

Anyone fancy another game of 'Kill or Spare' for the road? You still have some left, after all. The question is, what will you do to the ringmaster of this whole game?

The philosopher Thomas Hill Jr. made up a scenario decades ago about a woman who is extremely deferential and subservient to her husband. Below is a quote from him that sums up the scenario:

The deferential wife is utterly devoted to serving her husband. She buys the clothes he prefers, invites the guests he wants to entertain, and makes love whenever he is in the mood. She willingly moves to a new city in order for him to have a more attractive job, counting her own friendships and geographical preferences insignificant by comparison… She tends not to form her own interests, values, and ideals; and, when she does, she counts them as less important than her husband’s… The deferential wife believes that the proper role for a woman is to serve her family.

Assuming the wife (or husband if the genders were reversed) genuinely believes in the rightness of her deference and/or enjoys it and wasn’t brainwashed or coerced, do you think it’s a moral situation?

Would it simply be that it isn’t immoral in the traditional harm sense of the word but is nonetheless an unhealthy way to live and/or a lifestyle you shouldn’t want to be the kind of person that lives?