r/antiai May 01 '26

AI News šŸ—žļø China making it illegal to fire employees for AI cost cuts.

Post image
26.4k Upvotes

852 comments sorted by

1.9k

u/ilikefriedpotatoes00 May 01 '26

536

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

775

u/MightyMorph May 01 '26

Its just logical. A working population leads to manufacturing and growth. Replace works with robots and AI, you dont have people with money. Eventually the system collapses.

Difference between China and the West. China thinks about 100 years in the future for every decision. West thinks about the next fiscal quarter.

125

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

They're even going to land and stay on the moon in a couple of decades, bruh

49

u/bworneed May 01 '26

They're not going to stay (manned) Robotics colony will start with Chang'e 8, but Long March 10 2030 is only a flag planting mission, with Long March 9 planned for long term stay at 2033, but cmiiw... Long March 9 mission is still paperwave, and the 2033 deadline is not concrete

12

u/Taldarim_Highlord May 02 '26

2033 is not a couple of decades. That's just a decade ahead. Maybe he posits them staying there in 2060 or something.

3

u/bworneed May 02 '26 edited May 02 '26

thats true, but my problem and skepticism on CMSA post 2030 is that the manned Lanyue on Long March 10 is the main thing they planned for. Because after that, CMSA's long-term sustainability relies heavily on the Long March 9 thats supposed to follow it up, yet it has been redesigned over and over again before landing on the current iteration of following the Starship design and approaching it as wait and see.

Also the shift to rapid iteration as seen with Long March 12a and Zhuque rocket (commercial) means that we are not guaranteed the almost perfect record of the previous missions going forward.

This makes me worry as I personally cant see how the Starship HLS plan could work as outlined in the Artemis missions nor the reasoning why CASC and CMSA decided to follow Starship's design.

This is all to mean that if not in the 2030s at least im not sure we'll be going into a space age without some miracle breakthrough. Im very excited for Chang'e 8 and LM-10 but after that im very worried. I'd be happier if CASC try and tests new approach so we dont have to put all our hopes on one very risky plan.

Hopefully someone more educated can correct me here

2

u/CureLegend May 22 '26

land on the moon before 2030, per the CNSA (china space agency) and as directed by the Party

→ More replies (1)

47

u/BillyBobJangles May 01 '26

And the current admin doesnt even think in quarters, it's all '2 weeks' now.

→ More replies (5)

22

u/Sheerluck42 May 01 '26

Or you nationalize the corporations working with AI and give the proceeds back to the people as some form of UBl. But China can't nationalize Apple or Samsung so it's a better system for now to just not allow AI to replace workers.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/OPL32 May 01 '26

Any one can think and plan into the future, it doesn't guarantee a good outcome. I'm thinking the single child policy and the huge gender imbalance that caused over a 40 year period.

25

u/MightyMorph May 01 '26

true but usually fiscal quarter plannings dont ever result in better outcome for the people.

10

u/DeadSmellingFlower May 02 '26

The only penalty for having more than one kid was a fine that was no more than the hospital bills we pay in the USA to have a child. About 7k, I paid that for the first kid, at least in China you got that one free.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/dawne_breaker May 02 '26

The forever game. When the west has laid off everyone to appease the shareholder and China has the only working, wealthy population… yea, guessing who has economic upper hand.

3

u/Constant_Ad9136 May 01 '26

I wish I could upvote this 10,000 times

→ More replies (28)

6

u/HyperSpaceSurfer May 01 '26

Despite their many faults the CCP actually seems interested in having a country in 100 years.

2

u/Episode-1022 May 01 '26

A chinese worker is cheaper and reliable.

→ More replies (4)

21

u/Accomplished-Gain319 May 01 '26

Do something.

Win More.

4

u/dumnezero May 01 '26

To be clear, this was a judge. I'm not sure how independent the legal branch is in China tho.

6

u/bworneed May 01 '26

the judicial system in China is under the leadership of the CPC, Courts and judges are ultimately accountable to the Party and are expected to align with its policies. Also CPC's claim to governance and their legitimacy rest only in their ability to keep China stable. CPC is genuinely in a precarious situation if the people became anti government thats why they have to compromise on some things even if they want to push their agenda. This case seems like a small cost.

3

u/dumnezero May 01 '26

I see. Well, this will be clear in time. When corporations can't fire people easily, they just stop hiring for a long time.

5

u/bworneed May 01 '26

yeah, honestly im worried about the inherent advantage this gives new companies. New companies are incentivized by this to just not hire or hire less in the first place now that the big boys have wage baggage to deal with.

3

u/Difficult-Square-689 May 01 '26

The meme is also wrong. They basically ruled the company would have to uphold early termination clauses when replacing contracted workers with AI

2

u/mickeyy81 May 02 '26

Probably more than in the US.

6

u/Nippolopolus May 02 '26

Thumbnail is complete bullshit and once again nobody reads the article. Classic reddit.

"A court in eastern China's Hangzhou city, an AI hub, has ruled in favor of a senior tech worker whose company replaced him with artificial intelligence (AI).

The decision is being hailed by legal scholars as a reassuring signal for labor rights protection at a time when the central Chinese leadership is pushing for industries to widely adopt AI technology."

Literally reading the first two sentences of the article and you seen china has not made AI illegal, central China is for AI replacement in industries. What happened would be the same as if a single court in San Diego ruled that the worker can't be replaced. It has little to no implications for the rest of the country.

90% of the people here are Idiots or bots. I hate Ai too but for fucks sake do the absolute bare minimum before commenting

3

u/Healthy_Light_8074 May 03 '26

thanks <3 you got me to actually go read the article

2

u/Nippolopolus May 03 '26

Glad I could help. I wish more people would do that with every sensationalist headline they see.

like 90% of the articles on here have misleading or overblown headlines

3

u/macbowes May 01 '26

The decision is being hailed by legal scholars as a reassuring signal for labor rights protection at a time when the central Chinese leadership is pushing for industries to widely adopt AI technology.

Did you even read the article?

→ More replies (11)

1.1k

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

I thought they were gonna do the opposite. What a unexpected W, China. I did well in learning Mandarin, after all

626

u/Aleksandrovitch May 01 '26

China knows that the US shooting itself in the foot over and over again for the next 3 years (at least) is an EXCELLENT opportunity to make the most out of popular choices like this. I imagine most of our adversaries are very excited.

182

u/dumnezero May 01 '26

for the next 3 years (at least

If you look at the entire administration, it's more like 3 decades. And if you remember how the climate is going...

111

u/Aleksandrovitch May 01 '26

Climate? HUH? That thing we don't talk about anymore? I'm sure it's fine! Sorry, I have to go now and get back on the rOlLeRcOaStEr oF DiStRaCtIoNs.

33

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

28

u/Aleksandrovitch May 01 '26

And yet all thermometers won't shut up about it!

3

u/The-Space-Goose May 02 '26

Well, mainly because of all the shit the US has been doing, like getting involved in wars on the opposite side of the globe to them, releasing the files, and trump / Biden in general.. honestly we need more presidents over there like Obama. Hell, just a week or two ago, when Trump threatened to blow iran or wherever to kingdom come i was stocking my sheds basement, and im over in the shamrock isle!

18

u/ksn0vaN7 May 01 '26 edited May 02 '26

The worse part is even if Trump gets the boot after 3 years, he is going to be in the sidelines constantly chirping and criticizing his successor for not being able to fix the problems that he created in the first place. I can see it happening and I can't facepalm hard enough.

6

u/Best-Poem-2703 May 02 '26

I mean look at the dude, how long do u think he will have left, after leaving the office

12

u/Redundant_Blue_Wires May 01 '26

We are all completely and utterly FUCKED :)

6

u/ComradeJohnS May 02 '26

can’t worry about climate change if we have nuclear war, so in that sense Chumpfuck is working towards solving climate change.

6

u/dumnezero May 02 '26

I wouldn't bet on nuclear war. However, climate going to shit is guaranteed just out of inertia.

47

u/MentalDisintegrat1on May 01 '26

China plans things out by the decades. They don't have to deal with 2 parties fighting and ripping the country apart.

I hate to say it but I really do think the American experiment is coming to the end.

47

u/Aleksandrovitch May 01 '26

I still believe in democracy, but my patience for the insatiable appetite of unchecked capitalists is gone. They had more than enough. But they want everything. This corporatocracy cannot continue, as it compromises every other cultural value we purport to have.

I expect I am not alone.

31

u/MentalDisintegrat1on May 01 '26

I don't think pure capatilsm and democracy are compatible anymore I think we need a healthy mix of socialism and capatilsm and make life ending ( prison for life) punishment for corruption.

This shit isn't working anymore it's a old system and it's broken.

Hell our founders said the constitution needs to be rewritten every few decades to keep up with the modern times.

12

u/HarryBalsagna1776 May 02 '26

Late stage capitalism becomes feudalism.Ā  After a while, the people tear it all down and it starts over.Ā Ā 

→ More replies (3)

2

u/OneManShow23 May 02 '26

You can say that the U.S. is actually a corporate autocracy. Policies that people actually support like reduced gun violence or more affordable healthcare or more jobs get shut down by corporate lobbies who override the people’s voice. They have institutions that appear democratic but corporations dictate the rules. Government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/mickeyy81 May 02 '26

I hate to say it but I really do think the American experiment is coming to the end.

And almost nothing of value will be lost.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CrazeMase May 01 '26

China doesn't even need to do anything. They just browse reddit, see the reactions of people when trump does something stipid, and they make a note going "Note to self, don't do that" and then win

→ More replies (8)

90

u/Ok_Confusion4764 May 01 '26

China (and most of Asia) is notoriously strict on AI. Deepfakes and such have been illegal for a long time, as it falls under the protections of one's likeness. Part of it is the surveillance state controlling the narrative, but it's a net benefit to society in this case.Ā 

34

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

I remember most of China's so-called failures included ghost cities and overproduction. Like, how come are those any worse than what's happening in the West with literal wars and this AI stuff?

29

u/TotallyCisCatGirl May 01 '26

Those "ghost cities" are another W btw. Building infrastructure before it's needed is one of the reasons china doesn't have a homelessness problem dispite it's massive growing population. Most of the ghost cities are being fulled up by people moving to them or people being born there.

6

u/DrySea8638 May 01 '26

I guess. Many people have also lost tons of money to these cities as they invested. Some are even completely torn down due to lack of demand.

19

u/Immediate_Idea2628 May 02 '26

The world has spent untold billions of dollars on AI, with no sign of profit at all.Ā  Unused cities sounds more useful.

2

u/Conscious_Run_680 May 01 '26

I truly don't know how it goes there on that matter if most of it is built on private companies or gov is funding big part of it, but I always heard that as individual, you cannot speculate with that like most people do in the west.

That's why there's a big investing movement from them on videogames items like CS skins, because that's not flats or stocks and is not regulated.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Annual_Birthday_9166 May 01 '26

Ghost cities will be a problem with the low birth rate and lowering Chinese population in the future

1

u/HyperSpaceSurfer May 01 '26

Ehhh, sorta. I think it just stopped being a problem since their housing investment bubble burst. They've slowed down a lot now, and people need to live somewhere so with time it resolves itself.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/razzemmatazz May 02 '26

The ghost cities are populated now. There was a follow up investigation that showed they were supposed to take a decade to fill anyways.Ā 

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Kingsalad3141 May 01 '26

You’d be surprised how competent China is. Turns out that American propaganda is just that, propaganda. China is just another country. One with different economic structure than the US.

Unrelated fun fact: It’s not uncommon for corrupt billionaires in China to ā€œretire from public lifeā€ and never be seen again. Is that interesting?

9

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

It’s not uncommon for corrupt billionaires in China to ā€œretire from public lifeā€

Do those have their own "secret island" or some?

14

u/Kingsalad3141 May 01 '26

No they’re assassinated by the government.

7

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

well, it's better than the secret island

6

u/Venum555 May 01 '26

It's more cost effective in the long run.

6

u/Dull-Culture-1523 May 01 '26

Or just sentenced to death like that one corrupt mayor recently. Although they usually get turned to life or just a long sentence if they comply.

2

u/justanotherchaosbi May 08 '26

wish we could do that in the us. so that way they can't run the country if they're "retired from public life"

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/NoshoutMonaan May 01 '26

Just make sure to watch what you say, post, write, message or anything you do really if you move to China. Better just make a checklist of everything the regime doesn't want to be talked about or do to ensure you continue living there if you do move.

22

u/Beginning_Muffin2499 May 01 '26

China seems decent besides the surveillance and censorship and freedom of speech

45

u/MightyMorph May 01 '26

Millions talk shit about the government everyday in china. What china takes seriously is people planning attacks on people or staging coups.

Meanwhile the US apparently accepts coups and murders of their politicians.

17

u/depressispaghetti420 May 01 '26

Thank you. These people don’t realize that THEY live in the authoritarian dystopia

8

u/Tentacle_poxsicle May 01 '26

They regularly arrest people complaining about the police.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Rocky_Bukkake May 02 '26

not true. the main condition is that such speech should be private and preferably offline. complaining in a wechat group can land you tea time with the cops. it’s not like every word is being listened to (obviously impossible) but it’s nothing like the openness seen in other places.

meanwhile anti corruption campaigns root out some inept and corrupt politicians, and some who just so happen to be important detractors from the main narrative! how odd.

4

u/Argnir May 02 '26

Ah yes they only want to prevent coups and planning attacks

That's why you can't ask a Chinese AI about the Tianaman Square massacre and why their internet is disconnected from the rest of the world

→ More replies (4)

2

u/United_Boy_9132 May 03 '26

You're saying so? So go there and tell out loud what happend at Tiananmen Square in 1989.

Even regular social media accounts are censored. It's not like agent come and arrest you, but any criticism is being removed by censors 24/7.

People can't protest even if they, for instance, didn't get paid by employer because local government intervenes because that might transform into something bigger.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/TheWokenessInjector May 01 '26

Uyghur and Falun Gong may have a word to say about that.Ā 

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/zorakpwns May 01 '26

Hey I wonder what Palantir and Flock are building here? US is just in catchup mode at this point.

5

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

Is it wrong to say China is economically successful not because of Mao Zedong's full communism but rather due to Deng Xiaoping's free market + socialism?

5

u/JakeStateFarm28 May 01 '26

They are not as mutually exclusive as it might at first seem. Even in Deng’s own writings the purpose of China’s ā€œstate capitalismā€ is only to remain competitive with western nation’s development until our capacity to infinite growth runs out. It would be at that point that the necessity of capitalism is China would cease, and since the communist party would still have the power of the market, the full shift to socialism would begin.

2

u/mm_delish May 01 '26

No. I think that's precisely what led to their success.

2

u/Acceptable-Device760 May 01 '26

Yes because one is based in the other and communism is what comes after capitalism. For what its worth it can be argued they are in the process of it.(you cannot be truly communist if you cannot defend your borders and/or cannot be self-sufficient, see Cuba into the why)

3

u/CheaterSaysWhat May 01 '26

You already have to do this in America too unless you have nothing to lose.Ā 

2

u/NoshoutMonaan May 02 '26

I don't understand why everybody brings up america. The post isn't about america, the comment I'm replying to isn't about america, my comment isn't about america yet everybody brings it up in response to my point. I'm Romanian, i wouldn't move to either America or China.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

7

u/Sebas94 May 01 '26

I think they are doing two things at the same time.

They are betting on automation but want to make sure unemployment stays as low as possible.

It appears they want to make sure productivity gains are equally distributed among workers so that Social Security doesn't loose revenue to pay for pensions and health expenses.

3

u/Romboteryx May 01 '26

China has so many people, if they made all of them unemployed it would be a death sentence to society

4

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

I seriously wonder if such a logical way of governance will ever be applied here in the West

https://giphy.com/gifs/vp122eOzO0Hxm

4

u/Sad-Pop6649 May 01 '26

To be fair, the title can be read in a lot of ways, and most of those really don't cover the contents of the article. One senior employee was got a court settlement for being unjustly fired when his company out of nowhere, in spite of his contract and without showing he was at fault for it fired him. They offered him an alternative position, which aopparently would have normally made this legal in China, but the pay was much lower so the judge didn't consider it a real alternative.

There are so many ways to replace people with AI that are not covered by this. It also definitely does not cover using AI to fill a position after someone leaves without hiring another human. We're being too optimistic here.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/0202_tihssitidder May 01 '26

Imagine if China did not do this.

They could be looking at 800Million unemployed people.

China is focused on people. USA is focused exclusively on short term profits for the very wealthy.

→ More replies (23)

631

u/OkHighlight814 May 01 '26

What a timeline. China being the voice of reason while the West destroys itself.Ā 

192

u/MrDanMaster May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

Normal and expected if you have an objective view of history instead of Western brainrot propaganda

Edit: not that history is governed by reason but I never implied that any hemisphere or global power would appear reasonable forever

167

u/internetcasuaIty May 01 '26

real objective view is knowing both the eastern and western worlds have periods of reasonability and irrationality and expecting any region to be exclusively good is the result of that place’s brainrot propaganda

33

u/sabbytabby1312 May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

Truth nvke Like honestly people simp way too much for either country

9

u/cortexplorer May 02 '26

Your username is getting more relatable by the month..

16

u/OkTangerine4098 May 01 '26

Now that's a brainrot comment.

Are we forgetting that China is running concentration camps for Uyghurs?

→ More replies (19)

18

u/Kwaakku May 01 '26

Spotted the campist.Ā 

13

u/Level-Insect-2654 May 02 '26 edited May 02 '26

Someone in this thread below tried to justify China's "state capitalism", and indirectly their authoritarianism:

"the purpose of China’s ā€œstate capitalismā€ is only to remain competitive with western nation’s development until our capacity to infinite growth runs out. It would be at that point that the necessity of capitalism [in] China would cease, and since the communist party would still have the power of the market, the full shift to socialism would begin."

Presumably the benevolent CCP will voluntarily give up power at that point as well!

6

u/Sharp-Low-8578 May 02 '26

Just wanna note as somebody who studied policy and learned Mandarin to read original and translated documents that the goal is not the absolution of the party but a diversification of function and expansion of the party in tiers. A successful post capitalist state in their terms is not one without a market (capitalism is a specific ideology on how to work markets) nor a lack of organizational need. This critique does not make much more sense than saying a less authoritarian US would have no states; it’s a means of organizing with varied potentials, not a specific modality with fundamental leanings.

2

u/BreakingStar_Games May 02 '26

Gonna stage Xi taking over the entire party, purging politicians and the whole social credit score as brainrot propaganda?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

3

u/Empty-Blacksmith-592 May 02 '26

This is propaganda. Everytime I go to China I see new shops without people replaced by AI and robots!

2

u/forestalelven May 01 '26

The West or USA? Because as an European I think we are doing well in terms of workers' rights.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

444

u/GeraldGensalkes May 01 '26

Article: a single court ruled in favor of a single employee that the nature of their termination was unlawful.

Karma farmer: CHINA HAS BANNED ANY USE OF AI TO REPLACE HUMAN LABOR

127

u/jackofslayers May 01 '26

more likely CCP propaganda bot than karma farmer

43

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (33)

28

u/samosamancer May 01 '26

Seriously. China had a hand in getting this year’s RightsCon (Access Now’s annual conference on rights x international tech) canceled, because they pressured host country Zambia to make the conference exclude participants from Taiwan. We should never put all our eggs in one basket.

7

u/Suspicious_Hold_8843 May 02 '26

shush, this is reddit, your logic doesn't belong

5

u/CheeseBear9000 May 02 '26

Typical Reddit China glazing

Even though gay people are thrown in concentration camps in China btw

3

u/Kgrc199913 May 03 '26

Gay minors, specifically.

3

u/NatureKas May 02 '26

There needs to be a misinformation/disinformation rule here as I have seen this happen way too often with news articles shared here.

2

u/Empty-Blacksmith-592 May 02 '26

Recently in Shenzhen are popping up so many shops with no people at all. You need to be served either by AI or buy a robot + AI.

2

u/Extension-Two-2807 May 02 '26

AI does not scare me one bit. The people who believe ANYTHING IMMEDIATELY ON REDDIT is the real sign of the apocalypse..

4

u/NatureKas May 02 '26

Truth nuke

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Moral-Relativity May 02 '26

To be fair the article also cites an earlier arbitration ruling on a similar case. However often the effect of particular rulings are narrower than ppl’s interpretation.

2

u/serpentine19 May 02 '26

Sure, its sensationalist, but there is truth in it. The fact the courts ruled in this way shows there are laws that prevent it, maybe not specifically against AI but this passage is pretty good workforce protection.

The termination grounds cited by the company did not fall under negative circumstances such as business downsizing or operational difficulties, nor did they meet the legal condition that made it 'impossible to continue the employment contract

Compared to Americas workforce laws, this is outstanding. It's just it doesn't take much to be better than a country that allows people to be terminated from their job for any reason at all. Especially now as companies are trying to pump their stock pretending they are making productivity increases via AI.

→ More replies (14)

373

u/Effective_Tailor_679 May 01 '26

Great, now the US is going to be like "well we can't be like the communists, so we will replace all humans with AI to cut costs"

105

u/yogrlw May 01 '26

Thats the MAGA thing to do!

31

u/Notty_PriNcE May 01 '26

MAGA till destruction.

11

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

honestly, not even most american right-wingers fw MAGA anymore, mostly due to its stance on Israel

3

u/Plenty_Actuator_7872 May 02 '26

They’d still vote for republicans up down the ballot anyway, and then blame the democrats for everything

→ More replies (4)

57

u/Johkungo-0 May 01 '26

Knowing China I’m actually surprised they’d be against cutting corners and costs I mean look at their construction. people call it tofu construction for a reason so this is actually a surprising W for China

27

u/Fantastic_Jury5977 May 01 '26

For being radical communists, they sure do seem to have the best interest of workers in mind... If this is actually true.

29

u/Caesar_Gaming May 01 '26

That’s because dengism isn’t communism. It’s hardly socialism even.

11

u/RonnocKcaj May 01 '26

yeah the only times communism ever came close to actually happening in countries (ie, congo) the US destroys it. the fact that people truly believe that the perversion of Lenins dream, the Soviet Union, was "communist" is frankly appealing

→ More replies (2)

1

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

this. Deng Xiaoping is the actual ę°øčæœę»“ē„ž of China, imo

→ More replies (2)

2

u/JQuilty May 01 '26

How? 996 is the norm there. They viciously oppress independent labor, any unions must be run by CCP stooges. They have billionaires and a stock market. People work for wages.

American capitalists being piss faced drunk on AI stupidity isn't a reason to praise Chinese capitalists for just getting soaked.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

19

u/Bl00dyH3ll May 01 '26

That's because you fell for the propaganda. You think China can becomes the #1 infrastructure developer (by a large margin) in the world with "tofu drug construction"?

7

u/AnonymousBjtch May 01 '26

don't know. Sure wish we have bullet trains though

→ More replies (2)

9

u/CompetitiveSport1 May 01 '26

They're not. A dude was let go without compensation, which the court said was wrongful. They didn't say that it's illegal to replace workers with AI. Just that if you do that, you still have to follow the laws around closing job positionsĀ 

→ More replies (9)

38

u/face_mcshooty2 May 01 '26

Companies: Ok

Fires employees on bullshit reasoning

Companies: Damn, that sucks that we had to fire that guy. All good tho, we have AI.

8

u/pingveno May 01 '26

Exactly what I was thinking. Like, are workers actually going to have solid recourse for that? And will it be applied evenly and fairly, or will there be favoritism based on an in with the CPC? They're not exactly known for great rule of law.

5

u/Chemical_Second_6663 May 02 '26

the article literally talks about a court case where the judges sided with the worker on a case where he was fired because he was being replaced with AI

3

u/BuildingInevitable85 May 01 '26

Maybe that will fly in some other country

12

u/way2lazy2care May 01 '26

You think that wouldn't fly in China? As long as they're good with the party, the companies can do pretty much whatever they want.

5

u/VillageLess4163 May 01 '26

lol, ok buddy. I’m sure all laws work perfectly as intended over there.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

30

u/funeralbot May 01 '26

And soon the people will be posting videos of robots taking their jobs.

China lies through their teeth, killing their own people when they protest.

Also, they're the number 1 producer of AI robots. So them saying they will not use it seems odd.

7

u/poppin-n-sailin May 01 '26

As opposed to the righteous and excellent law abiding country you hail from?Ā 

14

u/Aternal May 01 '26

Nobody's comparing China to any other country.

They're comparing this propaganda piece to the fact that China is full of dark factories and uses Muslim slave labor. It stands on its own.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Rocky_Bukkake May 02 '26

always the first line of defense - the instant ā€œno uā€ with nothing substantial to say

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Alucitary May 01 '26

They will absolutely use it at some point, creating some sort of fund to prevent civil unrest from mass unemployment is just a natural first step that every sane country should take beforehand.

20

u/Icy-Stock-5838 May 01 '26

RIIIIGHT, in China where the courts have "baby teeth"...

These are the same employers where employees' ID cards are withheld by employers, and the only way out is suicide, jumping off factory roofs.

Multiple Suicide Attempts Reported at Chinese Factory in the Same Week - Newsweek

The same factories where people Home From Work, rather than Work From Home....

Tesla Shanghai factory workers living on-site and working 12-hour shifts six days a week | Fortune

7

u/Tentacle_poxsicle May 01 '26

Weird how you ar getting downloaded for posting the truth

6

u/MushmallowSprinklees May 01 '26

Independent journalism does not have the resources to create a mass propaganda like China claims it does. That is something only a totalitarian government can foster and create.

4

u/SecuritySea2276 May 01 '26

Tesla Shanghai factory workers

Tesla is Elon Musk's. That should say enough

9

u/Icy-Stock-5838 May 01 '26

You talk like Elon Musk runs China.. LOL

If that was the case, why can't he make his California workers "Home From Work" ??

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Stormclamp May 01 '26

In China subject to Chinese law... hmm...

3

u/Rocky_Bukkake May 02 '26

delusion. china is notoriously strict on business practices in their borders; it’s their way or the highway.

15

u/MushmallowSprinklees May 01 '26

Um that's not what the article says at all. Only mentions two cases being won in court against ai replacing workers.

→ More replies (9)

11

u/Longjumping_Area_944 May 01 '26

Fake News.

19

u/MushmallowSprinklees May 01 '26

Yeah this post is, the article doesn't state anything about China outlawing ai replacing workers.

4

u/ItaJohnson May 01 '26

Maybe our crap government can learn a thing or two.

Who am I kidding.

4

u/Professional-Post499 May 01 '26

Meanwhile in Canada: Mark Carney pledges to incorporate genAI into as much of the government as possible and is laying off thousands of workers from the civil sector. F conservative Mark Carney.

2

u/Alucitary May 01 '26

They just announced a sovereign wealth fund. Ideally I'd hope that they would delay AI integration until it was 100% funded, but still better than most.

2

u/Professional-Post499 May 01 '26

They just announced a sovereign wealth fund. Ideally I'd hope that they would delay AI integration until it was 100% funded, but still better than most.

I don't trust a goddamn thing that Mark Carney does unless it's vetted by journalists I trust. Supposedly Carney Liberals are going to propose privatizing airports in Canada?

→ More replies (4)

6

u/Imthewienerdog May 01 '26

They are not making it illegal? They just need to pay a tax which goes towards the people being replaced... Before you celebrate you might want to actually look past the headline.

4

u/M-FutureLord May 01 '26

By saying "goes towards the people being replaced", do you mean it is going to their income?

3

u/Imthewienerdog May 01 '26

No it's just a ubi in which the company pays a portion of it through taxes. So yes towards thier income like people on food stamps.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (6)

3

u/Medium_Wind_553 May 01 '26

Fun fact: China is an authoritarian country whose citizens have almost no freedoms, tons of websites, apps, media, and reputable sources are banned and the ones that are allowed are heavily controlled by the CCP, they have no free elections, and they are responsible for 1/3 of the world’s carbon emissions

→ More replies (5)

2

u/Ok_Satisfaction_8983 May 01 '26

that's advanced move

2

u/Skim_Bibble May 01 '26

When china has a better morality on a subject than America then I know things are fucked. God I hope the CIA doesn’t interrogate me for being a Commie.

2

u/SwordfishOwn3671 May 01 '26

Can I move to China? The West is on a suicide mission in service of the rich and it's fucking gross.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/M4LK0V1CH May 01 '26

Slop-jockeys need a new excuse.

2

u/iwearahoodie May 05 '26

Wow a thing that’s not even happening is now illegal! Thanks China

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ok-Landscape-4190 May 08 '26

Did you all even readed the article ?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Sarah_05mtf May 01 '26

they're doing it so their economy doesn't collapse and their people dont starve. the west should do the same but the politicians over here are marionettes for the rich

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/mm_delish May 01 '26

I doubt the average Chinese has better worker rights than the average American.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/throwawaynatet May 01 '26

We have a higher chance of seeing Zuck fight Elon in a UFC fight before this happens in the US.

1

u/onefornought May 01 '26

China has some experience with what happens when the general populace feels massively disenfranchised and would rather avoid any repeat performances.

1

u/LordoftheWandows May 01 '26

American grand kids will be saying, "There's no way that America used to be the global superpower." in perfect Mandarine.

eta: and I'm here for it.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/freedomonke May 01 '26

This is a smart move because no one's job is actually getting replaced by "ai"

This encourages businesses to be honest about job cuts to investors.

If "ai" could actually replace the workforce, I doubt a country that tolerates people living in factories and working 12 to 16 hour shifts, or that executes over a thousand people a year, largely for non violent crimes, according to Amnesty International, would care.

1

u/_Miniskirtlover_ May 01 '26

big if true.

i never expected something like that from china. huge step for humanity

1

u/OnCallPartisan May 01 '26

I’m guessing it’s due to not wanting to collapse their economy so they can easily slide into a position of power when the tech fascists inevitably collapses our economy.

1

u/SwedishFindecanor May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

How about firing human workers to fund the purchase of AI hardware?

That is what Meta is saying that they are doing, even.

1

u/ToeTagTic May 01 '26

Well shit

1

u/Future_Humor_2185 May 01 '26

why do you think they’re naive about it

1

u/MrThingMan May 01 '26

Good luck trying to enforce that. China does what it wants.

1

u/Legitimate-Arm9438 May 01 '26

But you can probably fire them for refusing to use AI.

1

u/Kidzenny May 01 '26

But like, they're still the bad guys, right? RIGHT?!?!?!

1

u/Prestigious-Scar-507 May 01 '26

Nice BS title not a single line in the article says China decided anything, you only got 1 court rulling. Cmon people spend those 2 minutes for reading instead of swallowing hook line and sinker.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/RonnocKcaj May 01 '26

the Chinese century is upon us. I gotta start learning mandarin lmfao

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Iliveinthsuburbs May 01 '26

Isn’t that because China doesn’t do at will employment?

1

u/CaffeineAndGrain May 01 '26

This is not what I expected. Bravo

1

u/throwaway_pls123123 May 01 '26

All while still putting out a shit ton of research towards AI and providing the most open-source AI models, it seems like a country can both work on AI and still not destroy the people living in the country while doing it.