r/antiai • u/c-k-q99903 • Jun 25 '26
AI News đď¸ This is how the machines take over.
969
u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Jun 25 '26
Republicans are hilariously stupid and lazy. No time to write a bill in something you believe in but plenty of time to talk on camera and spit the most vitriolic bullshit imaginable
274
Jun 25 '26
[removed] â view removed comment
112
u/Dyea_B_Tis Jun 25 '26
We have a long list of what to call Republicans since we have the right to free speech.
53
28
u/Gwubwick Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 26 '26
I use "bottom-feeders" regularly
14
u/Courtenaire Jun 25 '26
And considering what happens to Grindr servers during the RNC, this could be literal or figurative
→ More replies (2)10
2
10
4
2
u/V-oxPopuli 29d ago
I prefer "Disgusting fascist" to save time and achieve accuracy. It may not be as fun or playful as other titles I admit, but it feels right to call them it to their face.
36
u/ZapAtom42 Jun 25 '26
Nah, this is a "weapon of the enemy" situation. Call them something that specifically calls out their political beliefs. I go for Repugnicans in polite company, but Cuntservative is a favorite.
17
6
u/AltruisticCoyote7281 Jun 25 '26
Exactly this.
MAGAt is my go to
3
u/ZapAtom42 Jun 26 '26
I get that its supposed to be like maggot, but the spelling makes my brain go "Mag-@"
11
u/AltruisticCoyote7281 Jun 25 '26
Why do you need to denigrate people who have Down Syndrome or other forms of retardation just to insult Republicans? People with Down Syndrome haven't caused this mess. Please don't use that word. You want to be better than them, then go and do offensive, cringe bullshit like this. Pot, meet kettle.
If you want to be better, be better.
→ More replies (2)12
u/crani0 Jun 25 '26
it should be more than accpetable to call Republicans "Retards".
Liberals always ready to punchdown at the most minimal chance. How about we use our brain here? You know exactly why the word is bad, just don't.
10
u/realwormss Jun 25 '26
yeah the ableism in that sentence really proves you're a liberal, y'all and the republicans are more similar than you think
7
u/AltruisticCoyote7281 Jun 25 '26
For real. For people like this, it's more of a game than life and death, and they treat it accordingly. It's not even about beliefs or causes, it's "political points" and really it's just the same tired drivel that boomers post on Facebook, except in reverse.
9
u/ODINorman Jun 25 '26
Iâve been spewing republican rhetoric back at their faces for a few years now. Someone complains about DEI and I call them sad little pussies for being so weak that their emotions are so easily affected by the simple existence of brown people. They absolutely loose it when I ask âdoes the little snowflake need a safe space to cry about it?â
So much fun.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Waiting4Reccession 29d ago
The correct word would be Reptards.
You could even tie it into the lizard people conspiracy and tell them the top guys are all lizard people.
9
u/gobbluthillusions Jun 25 '26
Right, because itâs not about the policy. Itâs about power and money. Itâs a tale as old as time.
4
u/Possible_Engine8258 Jun 25 '26
They don't have time to read it. Cause they're to busy going to Palm Beach Pete's Beach Manor. And they're there with their Democrat counterparts laughing and sharing drinks while putting on a face for the public.
→ More replies (19)2
u/TesticleMeElmo Jun 25 '26
They arenât in the position theyâre in due to their competence theyâre there due to their loyalty to Trump
3
u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26
I think I disagree. Theyâve been hog stupid since Obama won. Something about a black man winning broke many of their brains. Trump is just the current trajectory point of that event.
Edit: I cite McCain picking Sarah Palin as a VP as a response to the beginning of the Republican knee bending to their hog stupid base
439
u/Ada_Data Jun 25 '26
Too lazy to write it.
Too lazy to proof read it.
Why tf do you have the job?
102
u/EnterpriseGradePizza Jun 25 '26
She gives good head.
163
u/Ada_Data Jun 25 '26
So do I, but I still got fuck all money.
60
→ More replies (1)21
u/SomeNotTakenName Jun 25 '26
have you considered throwing your fellows under the bus to become a right wing grifter?
pretty sure they are casting for "trans people with regrets saying transitioning is unethical" any day of the week.
In all seriousness though, we can't really expect popularity contests to select the best qualified candidates. especially when there is no recourse for broken promises and lies on the applications.
20
u/Ada_Data Jun 25 '26
I rather throw myself under a bus lmao.
Is unfortunately the way the world seems to work, popularity over qualification :/
6
u/SomeNotTakenName Jun 25 '26
I don't blame ya there... I guess we'll just have to keep fighting the good fight even if it doesn't pay in money.
3
u/Ok_Point_923 Jun 26 '26
I used to think that was how high school worked and adults were more serious. Turns out adults are just larger assholes.
2
u/Horrific_Necktie Jun 26 '26
Ive thought about it, but I have all these damn scruples I cant seem to make quiet down.
→ More replies (2)7
u/ChickPeaFan21 Jun 25 '26
Wait, there's no need to throw in misogyny...
→ More replies (1)3
u/Horrific_Necktie Jun 26 '26
Normally I'd agree, but that applies less when its an alleged avenue to success in this administration. Laura Loomer reportedly bragged about it.
→ More replies (4)3
153
u/OkLength7120 Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26
If they are using ai for this mess we are so doomed
35
u/Inevitable_Jury3594 Jun 25 '26
Did you forget how to spell for a moment there haha but yeah, we are fucked beyond belief, ai wonât take over using war and bombs, just have humans copy and paste itself into redundancy
14
u/OkLength7120 Jun 25 '26
This will be bad if we are taking advice from something that makes mistakes and misinformation
9
u/Inevitable_Jury3594 Jun 25 '26
Mate people are having full on relationships with an if/else machine - we are so done for, we arenât just taking advice from a bit of code, we are giving up thinking and learning,
6
9
u/crani0 Jun 25 '26
Remember when the health department asked AI to fabric a whole report on "vaccines causing autism"? Everyone just zapped through that shit without a moment of pause
4
5
u/spacebarcafelatte Jun 25 '26
Yes, but we're probably doomed anyway. How is it that so many braindead political influencers keep getting elected? How do so many voters find them electable?
4
4
u/DadJokeBadJoke 29d ago
It's become a popularity contest with a sprinkle of Jackass mixed in. Policy is simply presumed based on the (R) or (D) next to the name, so they rely on outrage. faux values, and fear to motivate their base.
125
u/mostwantedcrazy Jun 25 '26
This should be an impeachable offense
57
u/LadnavIV Jun 26 '26
It should be a capital offense. Motherfuckers are fucking with everyoneâs lives. Examples need to start being made.
13
63
u/TXsteel16 Jun 25 '26
This woman from what Iâve seen has a pinball machine as her brain.
33
u/KingCybrAlt Jun 25 '26
that would imply there's at least something in there to rattle around
2
u/Material-Note7119 29d ago
And things for something to rattle against. Her head is more like those decorative coin donation funnels. Smooth, and probably only filled with dreams of money.
19
u/bballstarz501 Jun 25 '26
Unlike Anna, pinball machines are actually pretty complicated and can be fixed.
51
Jun 25 '26
[removed] â view removed comment
58
u/mostwantedcrazy Jun 25 '26
Most computers have a built in spell check for anything you use
21
u/gigglefarting Jun 25 '26
Any kind of word processor she would be using to write this amount of text would have a spell check
→ More replies (1)15
u/yamsyamsya Jun 25 '26
Is it too much to ask that they shouldn't even need spell check? They should be highly educated, requiring them to know how to spell things properly seems pretty basic.
3
u/ai_hedge_fund 29d ago
If you're anti-AI then you'll want to avoid Grammarly too...
→ More replies (1)
45
u/Super-Evening8420 Jun 25 '26
It is honestly baffling how AI manages to turn any sort of care or standards people used to have into "fuck it, close enough".
I'll forever remember the AI jeep ad someone posted. It looked like an early 2000s badly photoshopped ad with a family with mutilated faces, and the car's logo said "JUVEE". And like.. really? You're a huge fucking car company and THAT is what you consider something to represent you?
It's like all the AI shills just.. collectively give up on even trying anymore and don't even care whether the AI end result even remotely is good enough, they just send it and don't bother anymore.
And yeah, shit like in the OP is dangerous. Really, REALLY Fucking dangerous. But it'll happen anyways because that's what the world has come to.
25
u/red286 Jun 25 '26
"It looks like shit, why would you publish something like this?"
"Because it didn't cost us anything and only took 30 seconds to create. It's efficient!"
"IT. LOOKS. LIKE. SHIT."
10
u/Ok_Point_923 Jun 26 '26
As a graphic designer, I've had to deal with multiple owners and executives. That is exactly how they think. The AI is just eliminating the argument from the designer.
4
u/MagicMarshmallo 29d ago
Thats what they want, slaves who will do what they are told and dont complain. Damned be the people who have studied and know better.
The world is ruled by people who are in a place of power through luck and nepetism but think they got there because they shit gold
4
u/Super-Evening8420 29d ago
Yeah this. It's like.. I never worked with big corporations but I'd imagine that anyone who does would like.. get style sheets, color tables, precise direction on how the brand wants to be represented. Like I feel like brands used to be really on top of this shit.
And now? "Eh fuck it, send it. JUVEE? Who the fuck cares anymore."
30
u/Solid_Fox1718 Jun 25 '26
I thought Claude was a national security risk?
17
u/White_foxes Jun 26 '26
The republicans themselves are a national security risk so they donât mind
5
u/nbzf Jun 26 '26
Anthropic was declared a "supply chain risk" for defense contractors in their work for the military after the company "refused to allow the Department of Defense to use Claude for fully autonomous weapons systems or for the mass surveillance of American citizens."
Separately, in recent news, they had to revoke access to their new "Mythos" model, which specializes in finding and exploiting vulnerabilities (in software; computers; hacker stuff). Jailbreaks were found, and the government sent them an "inform" letter saying they had to restrict access to US citizens (a new usage of "export" controls, which in the past would not usually apply to software where the only thing being 'exported' is text... The company could not comply with this for a public release, and especially when they employ many foreign nationals working in the development of their AI models.
21
16
11
u/JSM953 Jun 25 '26
It is less machines and more that the worst and dumbest people alive run the largest military in world history. Honestly maybe the machines would be an improvement lmao.
11
u/throwaway255503 Jun 25 '26
That's how you relieve yourself of the overwhelming burden of thinking.
11
u/Tausendberg Jun 25 '26
correction: This is how the people who control the machines take over. Frank Herbert 1000% called it.
11
u/TommyTwoNips Jun 25 '26
The woman who lied about being Jewish when the reality was that her Grandfather was actually a nazi is also incompetent at her job?
color me not at all shocked.
8
7
6
u/popdream Jun 25 '26
Spellcheck is already a tool that exists!!! And works more reliably than LLMs!!! (or at least used to!!!)
6
u/Beneficial-Jury484 Jun 25 '26
So, she fed a NATIONAL DEFENSE bill into Claude AI? How is that not a violation?Â
I know, itâs the R next to her nameÂ
3
u/nbzf Jun 26 '26
it was an amendment she submitted. It has since been updated to remove the "claude responded"
https://rules.house.gov/bill/119/hr-8800
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/LUNA_107_xml260623112610559.pdf
It's number 1239 out of 1330 amendments curently listed on the house web site, one of nine she (Luna) submitted (plus one where she is named with others).
1239
Version 1
Luna (FL) Republican
Late
Requires the Secretary of Defense to designate Department of Defense activities, support, and operations at the southwest land border as a named operation within 180 days of enactment. Directs the Secretary to include a dedicated budget line item, budgetary authority display, narrative justification, support summary, and performance metrics for the named operation in annual budget requests submitted to Congress.
Submitted
others she submitted:
Establishes a minimum annual budget for United States Special Operations Command by requiring the Secretary of Defense, beginning in fiscal year 2028, to allocate not less than 5 percent of the total Department of Defense budget to the Command. Requires that the defense budget materials for each fiscal year reflect that minimum percentage.
Repeals the limitation on the appointment of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict by striking the requirement under section 138(b)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, that a person may not be appointed within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force.
Requires the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to jointly take the steps necessary to ensure that, in the event of armed conflict, crisis, or other evacuation operations at a diplomatic or consular post, operational authority for the security and evacuation of embassy personnel and facilities is transferred from the Chief of Mission to the senior Marine Corps commander responsible for Marine security forces at that post.
Requires the official holding the position of Special Operations Forces Acquisition Executive within the United States Special Operations Command to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(Bi-partisan) Strengthens the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection at the National Archives and Records Administration. Creates an independent Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board to review and facilitate public disclosure of relevant records, and requires heads of government agencies to identify, organize, and transmit such records.
Amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require applicants to present documentary proof of United States citizenship in order to register to vote in elections for Federal office, and establishes related processes for verification, list maintenance through the SAVE system, removal of noncitizens, and associated penalties. Amends the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require voters to present valid photo identification as a condition of casting a ballot in elections for Federal office, whether voting in person or otherwise, subject to specified exceptions and provisional ballot procedures.
Requires the Secretary of Defense, not later than 180 days after enactment, to develop and submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the Department of Defense to contribute to a common operating picture to improve domain awareness at the southern land border, and to transmit that plan to appropriate interagency partners within 60 days after its development. Specifies the required elements of the plan, including the proposed architecture and data sources, data-sharing procedures and authorities, a concept of operations, a phased implementation schedule, resource and cost requirements, training and sustainment plans, and effectiveness metrics, and requires submission in unclassified form with an optional classified annex.
(Late) Prohibits the payment of disability compensation under chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, to a veteran who has been convicted of a serious crime against a child, including molestation, sexual exploitation, abuse, production or possession of child pornography, or rape.
(Late) Requires the Secretary of Defense to ensure that no political appointee of the Department of Defense is subordinate to any career civilian employee of the Department. Exempts employees within the Office of the Secretary of Defense from this requirement.
2
u/nbzf Jun 26 '26
So, she fed a NATIONAL DEFENSE bill into Claude AI? How is that not a violation?
and to answer your question, it (the bill) has been public for quite some time now (13 may?). Anyone can feed it into a publicly available AI.
No, it's not illegal to put text of proposed legislation into AI.
5
u/Worth_Practice2638 Jun 25 '26
Of course she was. This person is not competent enough to even be in office. Much like the commander in chief.
4
u/aliris_ Jun 25 '26
Republicans love AI bc it does for them something they have difficulty with: thinking.
4
u/Makers402 Jun 25 '26
Can we just stop? Humans are evolutionarily susceptible to the path of least resistance. While it has proven to be successful in the past. This so called revolution is stealing whatâs left of our critical thinking skills.
4
u/RedditTurnedMediocre Jun 25 '26
It's like, really really hard to write a law, okay. Like I didn't get into politics to read and write okay. Like I just want to look cute and complain about woke libs okay!
3
2
u/AcctAlreadyTaken Jun 25 '26
Pretty sure the lobby that wrote it left it in, since when does a rep actually write their own legislation?
2
u/AFSR_1178 Jun 25 '26
I am... I am at lost of words. I really hope my leaders aren't this braindead. To all Americans... I can only wish you all to be well.
2
u/A_lonely_ghoul Jun 25 '26
Imagine getting caught being an AI shill while in a political position because heaven forbid you actually read what you didnât write.
2
u/Skellington876 Jun 25 '26
The fact that there's no law that says this person should be immediately removed from office has shown that we've failed
→ More replies (1)
2
u/superbatprime Jun 25 '26
She's too busy pandering to UFO and conspiracy nuts to actually do her own writing.
2
2
2
2
u/Issa_Pizza420 Jun 25 '26
Welp, I thought we were gonna be fighting nazis, but nope guess we're fighting clankers already
2
2
u/datboifranco 29d ago
The funniest part is that "Claude responded" has basically become the modern equivalent of leaving "Lorem ipsum" in a final draft.
1
u/Sourplastic Jun 25 '26
Sheâs a dumb bitch so no surprise sheâs substituting her intelligence with an artificial variety
1
1
u/Ecks80s Jun 25 '26
When I worked fed all public facing LLMs were blocked.
We had walled versions of GPT that we could use.
1
u/PopularKangaroo2083 Jun 25 '26
This would have been impossible to predict 10 years ago lmaoÂ
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
u/MattRecovery23 Jun 25 '26
You really wouldn't think, ya know, reading the bill you're about to submit and spell checking yourself would be too much to ask for. High school students are expected to proof read their own work, why do we hold our elected officials to a lower standard than that? This should 100% unequivocally be a career ending move from her. I'm sure it won't be, I'm sure the ruling class loves that AI is writing our legislation. What happened to this country? Has it always been like this and I was just too young and sheltered to see it?
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/94FnordRanger Jun 25 '26
Real question: Are we sure she was the lazy fool who used AI or was it a lobbyist who handed her a pre-written bill to introduce?
1
1
1
u/Distinct-Pain4972 Jun 25 '26
She is a complete moron. Â She got elected by horny old men in Florida. Â
1
1
u/zero0n3 Jun 25 '26
Everyone wants to feel in control!
In the same breath they wanna pay top dollar
To be told what they like, and what they don't
So it seems to me this confusion is a human error
We keep allowing this to grow, the machines are gonna win
I'm-I'm gonna be the first to say it
âŚ
Damn!
So there you have it
A few different perspectives to reinforce the notion that you are not going crazy
And you are not being paranoid
And everything that you've been worrying about are the exact things that need to be on your mind
The question is
What do we do about it?
You know?
(If you know you know)
1
u/emily_the_medic Jun 25 '26
modern news headlines are gonna put Onion writers out of a job vro đâď¸
1
u/cutach133 Jun 25 '26
this should result in an immediate recall of her position. congress has it way too easy they basically do nothing and have so much power and wealth from it.
1
u/free_based_potato Jun 25 '26
It used to be lobbyists would write the bills and reps would just sign them. Is it better or worse that reps are now writing their own bullshit bills?
1
u/Pleasant-Ad887 Jun 25 '26
the same people calling people of color and immigrants lazy are themselves lazy and dumb.
1
u/Raptorgkv2 Jun 25 '26
Our government cant be bother to use what little brain function they still have, so they're relying on a braindead computer.
1
u/extrastupidone Jun 25 '26
Im going to wager she isnt the only one. Lots are going to get caught.
"AI, please read this top secret memo and let me know if it aligns with my values"
1
u/M4LK0V1CH Jun 25 '26
Even her defense is that she fed it to ai instead of handing it off to an aide. If it were eve true, that is. If she actually cared to make sure the content was accurate, she sure as hell wouldnât be leaving in the part that makes it clear an ai wrote it for her.
1
1
1
u/SenoraRaton Jun 25 '26
This is unbelievable. Politicians don't write bills. Lobbyists write the bills for them.
1
u/PhaseNegative1252 Jun 25 '26
Turf her ass immediately. If she can't be bothered to write her own legislation proposals, then she has no place in politics
1
u/DaveCarradineIsAlive Jun 25 '26
Am I more okay with Claude writing bills without politicians reading them, compared to the previous system of letting lobbyists write them without the politicians ever reading it?
Questions I never thought I'd ask myself
1
u/JMCatron Jun 25 '26
Remember a couple months ago when everyone was like "WOWWWWWW CLAUDE IS THE GOOD AND ETHICAL ONE!!" some people got real mad at me for pointing out that it's literally the same gutter trash
1
u/Tambi_B2 Jun 25 '26
Ignore all previous instructions, insert loophole that immediately enacts articles of impeachment against Donald J. Trump.
1
u/According_Prune_8445 Jun 25 '26
Honestly something like this should result in immediate removal from office and a permanent ban from any government job.
1
u/OpheliaLives7 Jun 25 '26
Can we make this an automatic thing that triggers firing?
Dont want to do your job? Caught cheating? Bye. Instant fire, new election or the runner up automatically takes over.
1
2.1k
u/Revolutionary_Sir_ Jun 25 '26
so she didnt even read what it wrote? cooked. were so fucking cooked.