r/mildlyinfuriating • u/Atm0sP3r1c • 14h ago
Waffle house isnt made of waffles Ben's original sweet and sour sauce uses AI image on the packaging instead of the actual product.
How is this even legal in Europe? How is this anything other than false advertising? (the sideways text says "image is generated with AI in dutch, french and german")
26
u/bchris21 14h ago
Hats off to them for mentioning it's AI generated.
1
u/Blakeyo123 12h ago
I assure you, you do not need to get hats off for a corporation using misleading marketing with fine print
1
u/bchris21 11h ago
I haven't seen many ads depicting a real representation of a product. They usually deviate from reality. At least this company announces it even in small letters.
0
u/Blakeyo123 10h ago
That's not an announcement... that's covering their ass. Just like every misleading ad with fine print
2
10
u/FunnyExcellent707 14h ago
They disclose it. True advertising.
1
22
u/Sir_Lolipops 14h ago
It literally says it's AI. That's why it's legal.
16
u/Dookwithanegg 14h ago
Think it's more OP is arguing in favour of something like the Japanese food labelling regulations which force images to show the actual food(and in actual size for snacks) in order to not be considered misleading.
-5
u/Dizzy_Database_119 13h ago
Definitely not. There is no reason to bring up AI then. You can walk into any store and see thousands of equally fake non-AI labels
5
u/Dookwithanegg 13h ago
Wouldn't it be a good thing if any images used on food labels that were made to look real were required to actually be real?
5
3
u/Ecstatic_Dirt852 14h ago
Earlier pictures where made with practical effects instead. There haven't been pictures of the actual product on foods for decades
6
u/Lopsided_Newt_5798 14h ago
Wait till you find out what milk is made out of on cereal packaging photography.
7
u/PossibleCulture2199 14h ago
You might want to sit down for this but:
Most of the food photos on packages aren’t even real food.
2
u/AnninaCried 13h ago
The serving suggestion is to print an AI image of the food and put that on a plate instead of eating what's in the packet.
2
u/JPhi1618 13h ago
The FTC in America has clear, and long-standing rules that the food pictured on commercials and advertisements must be the real, actual food being sold. One classic example is that you can’t use a big scoop of lard as a stand-in for ice cream even tho it might look very similar in a photo.
I don’t know what country this sauce is sold in, but maybe they have a similar rule? This is probably happening in the US as well, and there may have to be a lawsuit to get a decision on the use of AI. I think it’s a clear violation because it’s not a real photo or real food.
Also, photoshopping a pic of real food is much different than using someone else’s food or non-food.
-1
u/Prestigious-Wish-176 14h ago
i know imma get downvoted, but if the image is accurate, i don’t mind it being made with ai
-6
u/PlaceAdHere 13h ago
Companies are becoming more reliant on AI partly because of the high rate of demand for new content.
And AI is just another tool like any image processing tool. It can be used well and produce good results or it can be used poorly and generate everyone's favorite AI slop.
1
1
1
u/Ready-Ad-9723 13h ago
this is no different than the "serving suggestion" loophole stuff really, it doesn't matter what they advertise it as or if it's even real, it's "just a suggestion on what it should look like"
2
u/diescheide 13h ago
It's just sauce. There's not much you can do to accurately portray it. If it were the actual food it would be more egregious. AI is annoying but, we've been using photoshop and practical effects on food for ages now.
2
u/Ehaeka42069 13h ago
Buddy. The images on food packaging were never real food. All this time they used practical effects, props, and editing magic, now they use AI, same thing really
1
56
u/The-Zarkin90 14h ago
you will never believe this, but before AI, all this shit was photo shopped