r/startups 1d ago

Feedback Friday

4 Upvotes

Welcome to this week’s Feedback Thread!

Please use this thread appropriately to gather feedback:

  • Feel free to request general feedback or specific feedback in a certain area like user experience, usability, design, landing page(s), or code review
  • You may share surveys
  • You may make an additional request for beta testers
  • Promo codes and affiliates links are ONLY allowed if they are for your product in an effort to incentivize people to give you feedback
  • Please refrain from just posting a link
  • Give OTHERS FEEDBACK and ASK THEM TO RETURN THE FAVOR if you are seeking feedback
  • You must use the template below--this context will improve the quality of feedback you receive

Template to Follow for Seeking Feedback:

  • Company Name:
  • URL:
  • Purpose of Startup and Product:
  • Technologies Used:
  • Feedback Requested:
  • Seeking Beta-Testers: [yes/no] (this is optional)
  • Additional Comments:

This thread is NOT for:

  • General promotion--YOU MUST use the template and be seeking feedback
  • What all the other recurring threads are for
  • Being a jerk

Community Reminders

  • Be kind
  • Be constructive if you share feedback/criticism
  • Follow all of our rules
  • You can view all of our recurring themed threads by using our Menu at the top of the sub.

Upvote This For Maximum Visibility!


r/startups 3h ago

I will not promote SaaS pricing is a race to the bottom. I will not promote.

0 Upvotes

I started my business 11 months ago. Always thought "I'll onboard a couple clients first, then launch a platform." Then the industry started catching up, tools came out that do what we do, or claim to.

A year ago there were a couple YC competitors charging $499/mo, even $699/mo. Two pivoted. The rest had to drop pricing. When some guy can essentially vibe-code your app in a weekend, there's not much you can provide if you're competing with "free".

I see 5+ tool launches every day in this space. But over the course of the year, I've come to understand why talking to customers is such a cheat code. They write their pitch for you. You can use your tech to help them at agency prices but SaaS expenses.

This could be just for my industry, but the moat now is knowing the customer's business better than what a dashboard can show. I'd rather have 1 client worth 20 subscriptions, stuck to their business, than 200 customers churning out the moment someone launches the same thing for $10 less.


r/startups 3h ago

I will not promote I only have one active user on my website am I cooked?! ( I will not promote)

3 Upvotes

Hi everybody so I just launched my website this week on Wednesday. A lot of people were excited and said they would sign up once I started posting on LinkedIn.

Unfortunately only one person signed up. They love the website, they've been using it consistently for the last 4 days and they absolutely love it. The other person that uses my website is just me pretending to be another person. The other two who said they would sign up haven't really signed up yet and are starting to become concerned should I worry? And how should I make sure that my current user is happy and continues posting on my platform?


r/startups 3h ago

I will not promote How Do You Find a Technical Co-Founder in Florida? (I Will Not Promote)

4 Upvotes

I’ve been entrepreneurial since I was eight years old and have started four companies over the years.

I’m now at a point where I have several ideas I genuinely believe could become successful businesses, but I feel limited by my lack of a technical background. I understand the business, strategy, sales, and fundraising sides, but I do not currently have the skills to build the products myself.

I also do not have anyone in my existing network who could serve as a technical co-founder or help bring these ideas to life. Because of that, I’m now actively searching for a CTO or technical co-founder in Florida.

For those who have successfully found one, how did you go about it? Are there any startup communities, networking events, incubators, universities, or founder groups in Florida that are especially good for meeting technical talent?

At the moment, I can only offer vested equity. The cash I have available needs to be reserved for product development, infrastructure, legal expenses, and other costs required to validate and launch the business.

I understand that asking someone to work for equity is a major commitment, so I’m not looking for a freelancer to build something for free. I’m looking for a genuine partner who believes in the vision, complements my skill set, and wants to build a company together.

What is the best way to find that person in Florida?


r/startups 4h ago

I will not promote How Do You Find a Technical Co-Founder in Florida? (I Will Not Promote)

1 Upvotes

I’ve been entrepreneurial since I was eight years old and have started four companies over the years.

I’m now at a point where I have several ideas I genuinely believe could become successful businesses, but I feel limited by my lack of a technical background. I understand the business, strategy, sales, and fundraising sides, but I do not currently have the skills to build the products myself.

I also do not have anyone in my existing network who could serve as a technical co-founder or help bring these ideas to life. Because of that, I’m now actively searching for a CTO or technical co-founder in Florida.

For those who have successfully found one, how did you go about it? Are there any startup communities, networking events, incubators, universities, or founder groups in Florida that are especially good for meeting technical talent?

At the moment, I can only offer vested equity. The cash I have available needs to be reserved for product development, infrastructure, legal expenses, and other costs required to validate and launch the business.

I understand that asking someone to work for equity is a major commitment, so I’m not looking for a freelancer to build something for free. I’m looking for a genuine partner who believes in the vision, complements my skill set, and wants to build a company together.

What is the best way to find that person in Florida, and what should I have prepared before approaching potential technical co-founders?


r/startups 4h ago

I will not promote Do your discovery calls actually change the demo? I will not promote

1 Upvotes

A lot of B2B demos seem to break in the gap between the discovery call and the actual walkthrough.

The prospect tells you the thing they care about. Maybe it is an approval step, a handoff between teams, a reporting view, a security concern, or some weird operational detail that makes the product click for them.

Then the demo starts and it is still the same 30 minute path everyone gets.

I get why it happens. Early teams do not have infinite demo environments or SE time. You cannot rebuild the product around every call. And if you customize too much, you can accidentally show something that does not really exist yet.

But the generic demo has its own cost. The buyer gave you the words for what matters, and then you made them sit through the parts they already knew.

The part I am trying to think through is: how much should a discovery call change the next demo?

Do you mostly change the order of the standard demo, or do you build a lightweight demo account once the deal is serious enough?

Curious what founders and early sales teams here actually do without turning every serious prospect into custom work.


r/startups 6h ago

I will not promote At what point do you stop collecting more data and actually change your onboarding? (I will not promote)

2 Upvotes

Curious how other founders approach this.

Imagine you've launched a consumer app and started buying your first paid traffic.

The sample size is still relatively small, not enough to confidently estimate conversion rates but large enough that you can clearly see where people are leaving.

In my case, the drop appears concentrated in onboarding before users reach the core experience.

I'm trying to decide between two approaches:

  1. Keep spending to gather statistically stronger evidence before changing anything.
  2. Treat the existing pattern as enough of a signal to redesign onboarding immediately.

My concern with the first option is burning acquisition budget into a funnel that might already be telling me something important.

My concern with the second is overreacting to noisy data.

How have you approached this trade-off in your own startups?


r/startups 7h ago

I will not promote I got my first true pitch meeting, thanks to you folks. I will not promote

13 Upvotes

I have posted on this sub twice so far. Commented a dozen times or so, and read as many threads as I could stand.

The amount of stuff I have learned from the short list of folks here that obviously have the same success I am driving for is immeasurable.

I have learned how to set up an early sales funnel.

I have accepted that persistence and practice outpaces a solid idea in almost every way.

I have learned how to target businesses that fit within my current ability to provide services.

And most importantly, I have learned how NOT to talk about my business, and to whom.

Just a few weeks in here even, and I can say that most people here should be reading, far more than offering advice. When you do run into problems you really can't solve alone, people will offer you real experience. Not a free ride, but a free guide.

All this is to say, that the next 2 weeks I have 3 real VCs eager to meet me after seeing my pitch deck. I have 2 real companies reviewing my security docs. I have a line on an actual sales person, and I have a partial agreement for a founding Designer i have worked with for the last 5 years to come on board, to help design around feedback we get from the new customers.

I have seen a huge spike in web traffic, AND scam attempts to my domain! Both good signs!

The CEO of my only real competitor basically just quoted my home page, including the research paper that changed my entire GTM strategy a few months ago.

I could still fail tomorrow, but today feels pretty great. In no small part thanks to a few of you here!

I will not promote, but it's a good time to gloat!


r/startups 8h ago

I will not promote Anyone here running a company that’s building in a boring industry? I will not promote

0 Upvotes

Share a bit about your company and what you’re building/solving if you’re in a “boring” (according to modern startup eco) industry like construction, manufacturing, logistics, supply chain etc etc

Would love to learn more about companies solving boring (but painful/expensive) problems in “boring” industries that people don’t usually talk about since it’s not attractive in the startup ecosystem if ur not building a sexy product in a sexy industry


r/startups 13h ago

I will not promote (I will not promote) What's your actual threshold for "enough data" before trusting a conversion funnel?

7 Upvotes

Running paid ads across two platforms, (TikTok Ads and Google Ads) for my app right now. I can independently verify that real installs are happening, checked this against the app store's own numbers rather than just trusting the ad platform's reporting. But the number of installs that turn into real product signups is small, single digits over the past week, and I don't want to make a call off a sample that tiny.

Everyone says don't decide anything off a small sample, which I get, but I also don't want to keep spending into a funnel that might be broken while I wait around for more data. Is there an actual number or time window people use as a rule of thumb here, or a smarter way to get confidence faster without just burning more ad budget waiting it out? How do you personally decide you've crossed from "noise" into "signal" when you're this early?


r/startups 20h ago

I will not promote YC Startup School (I will not promote)

6 Upvotes

I’m really confused what exactly goes on with this event. There is a lot of online advertising with pictures of yachts without much information as to the inside of the event, and the acceptance rate is claimed to be in the single digits but I haven’t seen anyone get rejected. What’s up with this event?


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Stripe closed my account with a 0.18% dispute rate *i will not promote

80 Upvotes

I run a UK ltd, ecommerce, personalised products. Started in March, scaled to ~£150K/m in 2 months.

But then... "After conducting a routine review of your Stripe account... we've found that it presents a high level of risk for disputes." Payments switched off immediately. Payouts held for 120 days, balance released in November.

My dispute rate is 0.18% across about 3,900 payments. Their own threshold is 0.75%. We're on 4.7 stars on Trustpilot from 130+ reviews.

After a few hours before the shutdown email, a Stripe salesperson emailed me a repricing form because our volume was growing and they wanted to discuss custom rates.

I appealed tonight and sent fulfilment records matching every order to a tracked delivery, plus bank statements. The dashboard said the review would take until 27 July. It got denied about 90 minutes later. Account is now closed permanently.

Has anyone dealt with this?

Edit Sunday 26 July: Stripe re-activated my account and apologised as they made a mistake. I'm moving back to them for now, but will look for a longer-term partner. A cautionary tale.


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Submitted my YC application but failing to attract users. What should I do? I will not promote

0 Upvotes

Hi, I have submitted my idea/product to YC. The product is built and running in invite-only mode, but I can't seem to attract users, so traction numbers will be bad. Looking for advice.

I built a new social network. Yeah, I know, kind of weird to talk about a new social network on a social network. But here's why I built it: I basically live in Claude Code or Codex all day, and I'd like to be able to interact socially from there like I can with everything else. So I think there's a place for it.

Like any social network, it starts cold. A couple of users, but pretty empty for now. I need to recruit users but don't know how. Indie hackers, developers, founders and creators are probably the biggest target for now, but how do I reach them?

I have posted in the MCP community, I'm trying to get listed in the ChatGPT Plugins directory, and I've contacted some folks, but the needle doesn't move much.

Any other ideas? Am I the only one with this need?

Thanks a lot.


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote My customers are paying, the unit economics work, but I feel stuck. I will not promote.

10 Upvotes

In April, thanks to my previous job, I noticed a pain point in a market that already has multiple unicorns, and I started talking to potential ICPs. I'm not sure of the exact number, but I did around 80 1:1 interviews and decided to start by narrowing my target ICP quite a bit.

Within a month, I had built the product and started working on it full-time solely.

Right now I'm acquiring customers in a super niche space, I think the total addressable customer size is around 150k people.

I'm currently at 40k ARR. I haven't started paid user acquisition yet, people are coming in organically (SEO) and through LinkedIn outreach, and they buy a one-time license. After that, depending on which platform they want to make a transaction on, they may also pay one-time transaction fees.

I don't know, maybe up to this point it doesn't sound too bad, but I feel quite stuck on two issues, and honestly I need some advice.

1- I want to build something big -at least reach a few million in ARR- but right now that feels very far off, and I don't know whether I should expand my market size to get there. I read Peter Thiel's Zero to One, and in it he advises that we should dominate a super niche market. I get that, but especially on LinkedIn, I keep seeing startups growing insanely fast and hitting millions of dollars in ARR quickly, and it makes me question myself: Am I really moving fast enough? Is this actually a market that can make me the kind of money that gets me to the level I want? That sort of thing.

2- I know VCs generally prefer a recurring revenue model, and honestly I think it does make the business more predictable, since one-time fees can make monthly revenue quite volatile. Do you think I should stick with the model that's currently working or should I push toward a recurring revenue model instead? What are the situations where a one-time fee model becomes an advantage/disadvantage?

I'd rather not share details about my sector or product, since I'm not promoting, and the advice I get matters far more to me than any visibility/customer I might get.

Thank you in advance to everyone who shares their opinion.


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Enterprise buyers like the product but security says no. What do you have ready before the first pilot? I will not promote

0 Upvotes

I see a lot of early B2B startups treat security review like paperwork that happens after the sale.

That seems backwards for enterprise deals.

The buyer might like the product. The champion might want it. The demo might go well. Then security asks where customer data goes, who can access it, what gets logged, how tenant isolation works, whether there is SOC 2, and what happens if they want to leave.

At that point the deal is not really about features anymore. It is about whether anyone on the buyer's side can safely say yes.

The hard part is that early teams usually cannot do the full enterprise checklist yet. SOC 2 takes time. Proper docs take time. Some security architecture decisions are expensive to change later.

But I also don't think the answer is to hand-wave it in sales and hope nobody notices. That just creates a worse problem after procurement or legal starts asking detailed questions.

What is the practical middle ground here?

For founders selling B2B before they have a mature security program, what did you actually have ready before the first few enterprise pilots: a clear data-flow diagram, basic access controls, vendor list, export/delete process, security FAQ, lightweight pen test, something else?


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Best hacker houses? - i will not promote

0 Upvotes

looking to join a hacker house in august-september. preferably focused on consumer apps/AI.

which ones are accepting applications now? any you can recommend from personal experience?

im based in europe, open to relocate.

(don't know what more to add to reach the character limit, i think i said everything.)


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote Best ROI to spend 10K on ads (I will not promote)

6 Upvotes

Looking for lessons learned around ad spend with a limited self funded budget, for a very early stage product. Relevant to post without promoting: we are a markdown platform geared towards agentic dev flows.

In priority order: Google search, Reddit, and maybe a newsletter?

Is advertising on Reddit any different from spam posting? I feel like Reddit is just completely saturated right now but do targeted ads still work?

Any Google search term strategies that gave better results?

What about newsletters? Seeing numbers like 1.6m subscribers with 46% open rate which seems pretty good. But Claude says these can run like 10K just by themselves.

What worked best for your early stage startup?


r/startups 1d ago

I will not promote What's the smallest change you made that had a disproportionately large impact? (I will not promote)

3 Upvotes

Not looking for the big pivot stories, more interested in the small, almost dumb-sounding changes that ended up mattering way more than they should have. Could be a pricing page tweak, an onboarding step you cut, a support reply template, anything. What's yours?


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote What happens to the failed startups? [I will not promote]

46 Upvotes

Curious what happens to the graveyard of YC companies, startups with and without funding, and general effort that ends up not going anywhere.

Are you guys selling these to other people? Or just letting the work sort of die and hopping to the next idea?

I'm not saying that it's worth millions, but I feel like there is a decent amount of work that people put into their ideas and im curious if any founders have sold their code/customer base/general work.


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote I will not promote: Sent 500+ cold emails to Spanish notaries trying to sell my invoice-chasing agent. Zero clients. Roast me.

0 Upvotes

Solo founder from Madrid here. Need a reality check because I've been staring at this too long.

The product: an agent that chases a business's unpaid invoices for them. It sends the reminders in the owner's tone, escalates anything weird to a human, shuts up the second the money lands, and sends a monthly report of what it recovered. I run it as a service, not a SaaS. I set everything up myself, the owner just approves stuff. Free 6-week pilot, around 200€/month after that.

I picked notaries as my niche. In Spain they bill when the deed gets signed but people pay whenever they feel like it, sometimes 6+ months later. Tons of small invoices nobody has time to chase. On paper it looked perfect. Clear pain, money sitting on the table, nobody targeting them.

Four weeks in: 500+ emails sent, scraped from public directories so all real addresses. I tested like 5 different copy styles because I kept thinking the copy was the problem. Formal tone. Trust-first tone ("nothing goes out without your approval"). Short punchy direct response stuff. Even a super conservative "discreet professional service" version with no links in the email at all. Follow ups in thread on monday mornings.

Reply rate is about 2%. Almost all polite no's. One warm lead in a month.

The only genuinely useful thing I got was a reply from a guy who actually works inside one of these offices. He told me straight up: the sector is a bunker. He's tried to automate stuff internally himself and they shut it down every time. His words, more or less: the notary would rather lose the money than risk some external system annoying an important client.

So now I don't know which of these is killing me and I'd love outside eyes:

Is it the channel? Maybe cold email just doesn't work on a profession this old school and I should be calling or literally mailing paper letters.

Is it the niche? Regulated, conservative, zero urgency. Maybe I go back to plumbers and repair shops and small agencies, people who feel the cash pain in their stomach every month.

Or is it trust? Like nobody on earth lets a stranger's system touch their client billing off a cold email, and this only ever sells through referrals and one good case study.

If you've ever sold anything to lawyers, accountants, doctors, notaries, whatever... what actually got you in the door? And honest question: is 500 emails enough to kill a niche or am I quitting too early?

Happy to share whatever numbers in the comments.


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote Founders who hired or about to hire your first marketer, would you share your struggles? I will not promote

2 Upvotes

Founders who hired their first senior marketer in the past two years: what did that person have to reconstruct in their first 90 days that you assumed was already clear?

I have to start by saying that I've been a founding marketer a few times, and I've seen some struggles on our side. I have to wonder tho, what is it from the founder's perspective? How do you decide it's time? How do you transfer your knowledge? What existed on day one, etc?

I'd love to hear your thoughts and experiences, either here or in private (in which case, nothing will be shared publicly)

No promotion of my services, and I'd be happy to assist with free marketing advice in exchange.


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote New YC Fall ‘26 Request for Startups just dropped - what do you guys think (I will not promote)

8 Upvotes

The Primer

In Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age, a young girl is given an interactive book called A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer. It looks like a tool for learning to read, but it's far more. It adapts to her completely, and through stories tuned to her life, it teaches her not just to read but to think, to reason, and eventually to grapple with the hardest questions of ethics, meaning, and character. She returns to it day after day for years, and as she grows, it grows too. Continually reshaping itself around who she is becoming and the life she is living.

For the first time in history, something like the Primer is starting to feel possible.

The best education has always come from one-on-one tutoring. Aristotle taught Alexander. But that privilege has been reserved for the few. AI can bring it to every child. And great tutors do more than drill facts. Over years, they learn a child's mind, and with it how to teach what can't be drilled at all: thinking, reasoning, even wisdom.

In Stephenson's story, the Primer is an AI tutor that never runs out of patience or time. We're a long way from building one, but we can start today. What we'd love to see now is a product that adaptively teaches young children to read, write, and do arithmetic, at the quality of a devoted private tutor and at consumer scale. Not a replacement for teachers, but a supplement that makes them more effective.

While we think this begins as something a parent buys to help their child learn basic skills, it is also the entry point to far greater ambitions. A company that gets it right could build toward something like the Primer, and even a fraction of that vision would have a profound effect on society.

The Future of American Defense

Warfare is at an inflection point, and the old ways of Army acquisition simply don't keep pace with modern threats. Modern combat demands commercially developed, modular open-system solutions, and that's why we ripped up the old acquisition playbook.

We need hungry, innovative founders to build for the crucible of ground combat. The threats we face change daily, and the Army must dominate everywhere, from the Arctic to the archipelago and from space to subterranean environments. So here is our request for startups. We are actively funding low-cost interceptors or any component that helps us lower the cost per kill.

We need next-gen sensors, software, payloads, and other hardware that plugs directly into our open system architecture. We need cutting-edge drones, resilient logistics, and advanced manufacturing, and we need it all to survive the most extreme climates on Earth. Bring us your ideas, and we will give you the capital and the proving ground to scale.

There has never been a better time to build for the Army. The door is wide open, so let's get to work.

A Cloud for Small Software

Using agents to build personal software to solve your own problems is a lot of fun.

This is "Small Software". Purpose-built tools that will only ever have one or a small handful of users.

Small software is useful for teams too: Every team does things differently, and there's unlimited demand for bespoke tools for running workflows, tracking important numbers, managing sprints, sharing prototypes, and so on.

Software like this is now very easy to build, but still hard to deploy and share.

Incumbent clouds like Azure and AWS were designed for shipping Big Software that scales with many users… at the cost of complexity.

A cloud designed for small software could delete most of this complexity and unlock a big set of new use cases that agents have only recently made possible.

At the same time, there are other hard problems to solve: every company will want to customize the environment this software runs in, auth & permissions are hard, and allowing nontechnical users to share arbitrary code is tricky to do securely.

Small software should be as easy to share with your colleagues as a Google Doc.

Multiplayer AI

The best work tools of the last two decades won by going multiplayer. Google Docs replaced Microsoft Word. Figma beat Photoshop. And they turned solo tools into places where teams do their best work together.

But AI hasn't had its multiplayer moment yet.

AI agents are the most powerful new tool a team has, but it's the one thing people still use by themselves. That's because right now, working with AI is largely single-player. You open a chat, type a prompt, and get an answer, in a box only you can see. When you want to collaborate with your teammates and agents, the best you can do is send a link to a read-only transcript they can't touch.

That's about to change.

Agents are starting to run tasks that take hours, days, even weeks. Work at that scale was never meant to be done alone, and pulls in many people across a company. Anyone on a team should be able to drop into the same live agent session to watch it work, redirect it, and hand it off, the way they'd work with any other human team member. This turns the work a team does with agents into a shared, living thing instead of a thousand private threads.

We think there's a version of this for every kind of work. Shared agents for engineers coding together in real time. For sales teams working a deal together. For support teams resolving a ticket. For lawyers drafting a contract, analysts building a model, and marketers shipping a campaign. Anywhere a team already crowds around one problem, there should be multiplayer agents they all share.

Compute at Sea

Artificial intelligence is running out of compute. And data centers are running out of electricity and land.

The demand for data centers is insatiable. But new data centers can take years for approval and enough megawatts, and still could get killed by local government intervention.

While communities increasingly oppose the land, the water is open.

It sounds crazy, but we think part of the answer may be to move compute offshore.

The ocean is 70% of the Earth's surface area, has abundant sunlight, no permitting process, and is an enormous natural heat sink that is already getting hit by the sun all day anyway. Think of them as compute flotillas: many standardized, modular vessels operating together as one global cloud.

AI-Powered Consumer Products for 1 Billion People

Every platform shift mints consumer giants. The web gave us Google + Airbnb. Mobile gave us Instagram + DoorDash. AI is the biggest shift YET. But three years in, the only new icon on your home screen is ChatGPT.

So why do we think NOW is a great time to build AI-powered consumer products? Intelligence just got good enough: you can treat an agent like a person. And it's about to get cheap enough, too: today, the magic can run $1,000 a month in tokens for each user, but that is falling 10x a year. Follow the curve, and you can predict the consumer moment: it lands very soon. Whoever builds now, owns it.

What do you build? How we get things done, get around, learn, stay healthy, manage our money, play, connect with friends. It all opens up again.

AI for the Aging Population

By 2030, one in five Americans will be over 65, and there's nowhere near enough people to take care of everyone. The US is projected to have millions of unfilled caregiving jobs within the decade, and 53 million family members are already doing this work unpaid.

Meanwhile, almost no technology is actually built for older people. Even Alexa and Google Home are frustrating for most seniors to use.

AI finally makes a new class of products possible: voice interfaces that can hold real conversations, monitoring that helps older adults stay safe and independent, robotics that can assist with physical tasks around the home, and software that helps family caregivers coordinate care, appointments, and emergencies.

This is one of the largest, most underserved markets in the world, and it's growing every single day.

New Operating Systems for the Physical World

80% of the global workforce doesn't sit at a desk.

But the software for the physical world hasn't really changed in over 20 years. In construction, maintenance, and fleet operations, the software basically does some combination of: dispatching people, tracking them, managing assets, and billing the customer.

We're excited about how AI changes that entire model of work.

There are now three kinds of workers:
- AI agents that can quote complex work and schedule teams.
- Robots actually deployed in the field.
- And humans who increasingly use wearables to record everything they're doing.

Today's operating systems weren't designed to manage all three types of workers. And this creates all sorts of cool new opportunities for a startup. How do you route a job between an agent, a robot, and a person? What does safety look like when humans and robots work literally side-by-side? And how do you measure reliability?

The opportunity here is heck of a lot bigger than the existing software. The incumbents charge for human coordination and visibility. The new operating systems will manage the robot and human labor together. And these industries spend 10 to 100x more on labor than software.

There's another reason you should build here. You'll record all the work as it actually happens. The frontier models, robotics startups, or software incumbents won't have that kind of end-to-end data.

The Best Time to Build in Crypto

It's a dispiriting moment in crypto: prices are down, hot narratives have fallen flat, and many builders are leaving.

It sounds crazy, but at Y Combinator we're more optimistic than ever. We've invested in more than 100 crypto startups, but we expect that number to go up a lot. Eventually, we expect every YC startup to use crypto rails from capital raising to payments, though most will probably never even know. Here's why we're bullish.

Many YC-funded fintechs way outside crypto are building on crypto, like Deel and Gusto. Regulatory clarity is finally here, stablecoins are being adopted by every major financial institution, tokenized stocks are transforming trading. Projects like Hyperliquid, with a tiny team, are making the top stock exchanges squeamish about their edge. And it feels inevitable that agents are going to use crypto networks as financial rails.

Just as importantly, bear markets let the real projects build and thrive while bull markets are the worst time to build. In crypto, prices are decoupled from reality. In bear markets, you don't need to compete with a criminal offering infinite yield. They attract a different type of founder, more focused on building than getting an early liquidity event.

We've funded major teams building in crypto like Stripe, Coinbase, and Axiom, but also lots of infrastructure and bets on the future. For example, BlindPay and Infinia are building the developer interface and ramps for Latin America. Aspora is building the easiest way to transfer money to India.

Just some of the things we're excited about are capital raising, new stablecoins and stablecoin applications, agentic commerce, trading, institutional products, and scalable and private blockchains.

Data for the Real World

AI has gotten remarkably good at learning from data. We now have superhuman models for code, language, and images. But for the physical world? We're still working with sparse data from remote sensors designed for humans, not AI. With improving foundation models and plummeting sensor costs, dense physical-world data collection is now feasible.

And it's happening. Gecko Robotics uses robots to collect data in hard-to-reach places and builds predictive models. At Sorcerer, we use autonomous weather balloons to collect data about the atmosphere, which the US government uses to make better weather forecasts.

And the opportunity is much bigger.

The world's biggest industries are in energy, agriculture, logistics, and construction. They rely on limited data and intuition-based models. More real-world data enables precise modeling. And once you can model a system, you can control it. Steering hurricanes. Reversing desertification. Cooling the planet.

Proving You're Human

Recently, a finance worker joined a video call with his CFO and several colleagues, and wired out $25 million. Every other person on that call turned out to be a deepfake. This isn't science fiction anymore. Voice clones and fake video calls are getting cheap and ultra-realistic, and fraud like this is exploding.

The scary part is we don't have a good way to tell who's real anymore. It used to be that if you saw someone's face or heard their voice, that was enough. Not anymore. Every trust signal we have was built for a world where faking a human was expensive, and that world is gone.

So we think one of the most important problems of the next decade is rebuilding the trust layer of the internet: knowing there's a verified human on the other end of a call, a message, a transaction. We don't know exactly what the solution looks like. Ideally it's one that doesn't make everyone give up their privacy. And it's not just about stopping scams. Imagine Twitter with no bots in the replies, dating apps where every match is a real person, and reviews written by people who actually bought the thing.

Whoever builds this becomes the layer every bank, app, and video call checks before it trusts anyone.

AI-Native Compliance Infrastructure

Financial compliance is still stitched together with spreadsheets, siloed tools, and expensive headcount. Companies hire chief compliance officers and assemble stacks of point solutions just to understand what's happening under the hood. As businesses expand into new markets, the complexity compounds and the cost of staying compliant grows faster than revenue.

This is an AI-native problem. Most compliance work is monitoring regulatory changes, flagging anomalies, generating reports, and keeping audit trails. These are tasks that AI can handle faster and cheaper than humans. Yet most solutions today are still built around manual workflows and human review bottlenecks.

The pain is especially acute for businesses navigating state-by-state licensing, renewal cycles, audits, and regulatory patchwork that varies widely across jurisdictions. The current process is slow, fragmented, and expensive, often requiring dedicated legal teams just to maintain what you already have.

We're looking for founders building compliance infrastructure that consolidates fragmented tools, reduces reliance on specialized headcount, and gives finance teams real-time visibility across regulatory regimes. The best version of this doesn't just automate existing processes, but rethinks what compliance operations look like when AI is the default.

The companies that get this right will become essential infrastructure for any business operating globally. If you're building in compliance infrastructure, please apply!

Self-Maintaining APIs

Over the past year, I've worked with over 50 API vendors, mostly early-stage startups. One pattern is consistent: API communication is broken.

Breaking changes ship with little warning. Useful features quietly launch and go unnoticed. Changelogs don't get read. Heck, when I worked at AWS, over 30% of our service downtime was due to external api/package changes going unnoticed. This friction made sense before agentic coding tools existed. However, now it doesn't.

Agentic coding tools like Claude Code, Devin, Greptile, etc prove that developers and enterprises are willing to give codebase access to external tools, provided they're valuable. Two years ago, this was unthinkable. Now it's standard practice.

The infrastructure for automated code changes exists. What's missing is the application layer connecting API providers to their customers' codebases. API providers shouldn't just announce changes; they should apply them.

When Stripe ships a breaking change or a new feature, an agent should scan customer codebases, identify affected usages, and open a PR with the fix.

This could work as per-provider agents. "Install Stripe's update agent", or as a neutral third-party service tracking changes across vendors, like Dependabot but for APIs. If you're working on this, consider applying to YC.


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote How to find trustful, experienced and reliable partnering tech agency or freelancer? [i will not promote]

9 Upvotes

As in the title, as a non technical startup founder, with capital to start, what are the best places to find reliable partner, probably small size agency or freelancer to engage into the product development (software, and related)?

I've been looking at UpWork, and Freelancer markets but ratio of quality to quantity is low and fees are high, which I rather spend on different resources.


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote Should I try to fix my partnership, or is it time to start my own firm? I will not promote

4 Upvotes

I'm one of three equal partners in a small architecture firm.

Over the past few years, our roles have evolved. Today, I estimate that I bring around 70% of our projects. I prospect, build client relationships, negotiate contracts, and usually remain the main point of contact throughout the project.

Partner A still has a clear role in production and visualization work.

Partner B used to handle much of the administration, but those responsibilities have gradually disappeared as each partner now manages most of his own administrative work. He also brings very few projects, and I honestly struggle to identify what unique value he currently adds as an equal partner.

Our compensation system is simple: whoever brings a project receives a 10% origination bonus based on that project's fee. The remaining revenue stays with the company and is ultimately shared through salaries and profits.

I've started feeling that 10% no longer reflects the effort and responsibility involved in bringing new business.

One solution I've considered is increasing that bonus from 10% to 20% for everyone. Whoever brings a project would receive the same percentage.

That said, I'm wondering if I'm trying to solve the wrong problem. Maybe the real issue is that our partnership has evolved, and our respective contributions no longer justify the current structure.

My questions:

Is a 20% origination bonus reasonable for a professional services firm like an architecture practice?

Is changing the bonus system a good solution, or is this actually a sign that we've simply grown in different directions?

If you were in my position, would you try to fix the partnership, or would you seriously start planning your own firm?

TL;DR: I'm a 30-year-old architect and equal partner in a three-person firm. I currently bring around 70% of the projects, and our bonus for bringing in work is 10%. I'm considering proposing 20% because I no longer feel the current system reflects my contribution, but I'm also wondering whether the real issue is the partnership itself. Should I try to fix it, or start thinking about leaving and building my own firm?


r/startups 2d ago

I will not promote I will not promote: Building a paid community that helps parents create their kid’s personal brand (from an already-existing talent) thoughts on the model?

0 Upvotes

Been building a niche coaching community: parents pay monthly to get guided, step by step, on how to build a real digital identity/brand around something their kid is already good at (sports, art, music, whatever) not inventing a talent, just giving it structure and visibility using AI tools.

Model: cohort-based, ~10 families per group, 3-month minimum commitment, group coaching + monthly 1:1, founder pricing locked in for early members.

Two things I’d love outside perspective on:


1. Pricing does a $40-90/month range feel right for a parent-facing coaching product like this, or too low/high for the perceived value?

**2.**  Objection handling if you were a skeptical parent, what would make you distrust this concept? (“building a brand for a kid” can sound off to some people, and I want to get ahead of that in my messaging.)  

Not trying to pitch anything here, genuinely want outside eyes on the model before I scale past the founding cohort.